Pentaxophile

Joined: 6th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Pentaxophile
coker wrote:
Thanks Will.

Yes, I used a tripod(!)

I was after, as near as I could, points of light as opposed to trails.
Would lowering the ISO not have increased the exposure time?
The stars are already just beginning to trail anyway, @ 15secs.
Keeping the exposure time down, with lowISO, would also have meant recording only the brighter stars & I was keen to record as many as poss.

Does all this make any sense?

Roger.
Ah, I see now! Makes sense.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Stars at 08/03/2011 - 15:13

Pentaxophile
Under-rated? To be honest the praise heaped on the 18-55mm lens on this forum is a bit over the top... yes it's good value, but it isn't amazing. The 16-45mm is very much sharper especially at the wide end and large apertures, and the CA is very simple to clean up without affecting image quality.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Zooms or Primes at 08/03/2011 - 10:35

Pentaxophile
That's right... if we weren't willing to work around the occasional little foibles, we wouldn't be Pentaxians!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K-5 AF under tungsten light issue .... at 08/03/2011 - 10:17

Pentaxophile
This is really cool Bob, excellent idea using continuous shooting rather than an intervalometer. Fortunately the K7 does 30 seconds without DFS, so if I had a go at this, I could do it in a third as many shots (and presumably use a smaller aperture). Did the exposure have to be correct on each shot for the program to work, or does it 'add' exposures together?

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Startrails for 5 hours above my house. at 08/03/2011 - 10:00

Pentaxophile
Very nice. I presume you had to use a tripod anyway, so why didn't you use a lower ISO to avoid having noise?

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Stars at 08/03/2011 - 09:53

Pentaxophile
Well the hack doesn't work then! 'Heat' isn't the culprit as a DFS will not reduce heat any! It will reduce NOISE caused by the heat though. It just would have been nice to have the option to turn it off and do a manual dark frame at the end of a shoot.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Slow processing K7 at 08/03/2011 - 00:13

Pentaxophile
Sean282 wrote:
Not on exposures greater than 30 seconds Stefan

Latest K7 firmware allows you to turn NR off/on but the system overrides these settings on longer exposures (>30secs)
Stefan's link relates to a hack which does (potentially) allow DFS to be completely disabled.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Slow processing K7 at 07/03/2011 - 23:38

Pentaxophile
Anvh wrote:
Btw Pentax has a camera above the K5 so what are they complaining about?
Sadly not within the K-mount system though.

It's an odd review. The K-x itself comes out very well, which is good news. But strange that they would review a product at the end of its life cycle when its replacement is already out (the K-r). The point about lens range is actually true but not that relevant for most users. The point about the K-5 is certainly not true, and again, odd, becuase the K-5 had only just been released when this was written and not extensively reviewed.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K-x review blasts K-5 (!?) at 07/03/2011 - 23:34

Pentaxophile
I have yet to hear a convincing argument for using Sv mode, although of course if it 'works for you' fair enough!

TaV is another thing entirely, very useful. I would use it for photos under floodlights in fact. Select an appropriate shutter speed for panning action shots, and an appropriate aperture and let the camera adjust the ISO. In Sv mode you sometimes might be using a needlessly high ISO.

There is only one thing that annoys me about TaV. At the moment if the camera can't select a low or high enough ISO for a correct exposure, you just get an over or under exposed image. You should be able to tell the camera to over-ride either the aperture or shutter speed setting to avoid this.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Sv Mode... at 07/03/2011 - 22:05

Pentaxophile
I wouldn't cry... the 35 2.4 is a very nice lens, less than a stop slower than the 31mm (not that I am saying it is on a par with that particular lens!)

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on What lenses to keep and what to get rid of and what new lens should I buy? at 05/03/2011 - 16:28

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo