Pentaxophile

Joined: 6th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Pentaxophile
Stitching is good, but it can fail to work where you have foreground detail very close to the camera (unless you do a vertical pano), and it's very much as case of planning a shot and then cropping your composition afterwards... it's not very immediate.

This was composed from vertical 24mm shots, using ICE:

Comment Image


But sometimes a shot would be hard to achieve in this way, and the perspective distortion of a UWA works in the images' favour. For example when you are taking a picture of an interior, or within a confined space and want to include it all in shot.

pammihooper wrote:
Have Tamron wide-angle (very, very soft and muddy detail in the landscape)
I wonder which lens you mean? Surely not the 17-50, which is so sharp it's almost unbelievable?

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Lens - decisions decisions (wrong ones) at 24/08/2011 - 20:53

Pentaxophile
I think AG did the right thing, and $500 was a reasonable amount he might actually end up getting paid. Sticking 2 fingers up by asking for a ridiculous fee is all very well, but personally I'd rather get paid.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Free use of a photograph at 24/08/2011 - 12:58

Pentaxophile
It'd be a while before I can discuss it with her so please go ahead Steve.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K100D for £120. at 23/08/2011 - 20:07

Pentaxophile
I wonder if there will ever be a big sell-off of the affected K5s at a knock down price? I'd probably fork out £200 for a mildly affected one and just become adept at cloning

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Nearly K5 at 23/08/2011 - 20:05

Pentaxophile
Lovely quirky shot, well done!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Well I'm stunned too! at 23/08/2011 - 20:03

Pentaxophile
Trying to bring the subject back on topic, despite my earlier efforts, another huge value lens is the 135mm f3.5. It's good stopped down, bit 'blah' wide open but ridiculously small and cheap. For £35 you can't go wrong (not sure why they always seem to cost £35, I think it's just for completeness - 135mm, f3.5, £35... )

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on The Best Value Pentax Lens? at 23/08/2011 - 20:01

Pentaxophile
I wonder if my sister would like it - she asked me for my K200d but I had already sold it. I'll ask!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K100D for £120. at 23/08/2011 - 19:49

Pentaxophile
Yes, it's held underneath the Hockley flyover, reclaiming a rather intimidating neglected space for the community. The graffiti is a vast improvement on the brainless tagging that normally decorates the walls of the underpasses.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Flyover Show, Birmingham at 23/08/2011 - 19:48

Pentaxophile
Yes, (failing medium format), 35mm film or full frame are the way forward for shallow DOF stuff. Where did I put that Ektar?

Anvh wrote:
Pentaxophile wrote:
you won't get shots looking like that on a Pentax (unless you get a Sigma 30mm f1.4)
There is one Pentax DSLR though and it can get shots looking even better
Why - have Pentax brought out a DSLR with a 135 format sensor? Used on a K5 the same lenses will be cropped, turning it from a normal lens to a short tele, and reducing the effect of narrow dof. Annoying.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on The Best Value Pentax Lens? at 23/08/2011 - 18:50

Pentaxophile
Algernon wrote:
Hardly any of these lenses have any character, your better off with
a 55mm f/1.4 Tomioka for around £60 or if you can afford it the f/1.2
for £500 link
A lot of those shots are flattered by being taken on full frame. You won't get shots looking like that on a Pentax (unless you get a Sigma 30mm f1.4)

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on The Best Value Pentax Lens? at 23/08/2011 - 16:37

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo