Pentaxophile

Joined: 6th May 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Pentaxophile
I'd settle for a DA version of the FA135 2.8 which looks like it was excellent, but seems quite rare second hand. I love the limiteds but gotta watch those pennies

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on New Samyang lens at 02/09/2011 - 20:06

Pentaxophile
I guess it allows you to focus then recompose, then take the shot. On the shutter button the AF will kick in when you press the shutter and your careful prefocussing will be undone. Must try it. Don't think exposure lock is affected at all.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on AF button or shutter button, AF-C, AF-S at 02/09/2011 - 17:41

Pentaxophile
rparmar wrote:
Hey Pentax, how about a small 24mm f/2 Limited sometime this decade?
Yes that would be nice, just delete the word 'limited' from the equation stick a plastic lens mount on and I'll buy it!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on New Samyang lens at 02/09/2011 - 17:34

Pentaxophile
rparmar wrote:
Anvh wrote:
Indeed, you actually need to read several to have a fair idea but most of the time the review on imaging resource are always quite good.
Like similar sites the Imaging Resources reviews consist of enumerating and comparing features. The writers treat cameras like gadgets and rarely say a single word about photography. These articles are useful only as glosses on the manufacturer's press releases and for certain functional determinations.
I don't recognise that assessment of Imaging Resource, Robin. As well as probably the most comprehensive run-down of camera features and easily compared image samples - which of course we all want to see - the actual text of their reviews suggests the writers are keen photographers who try these products in real life situations. It's something that has always struck me about Imaging Resource, and perhaps it's why they seem to have been tentatively positive about the Q despite the sensor and price not really stacking up on paper.

Quote:
When shooting portraits, I've found that reacquiring my subject quickly helps me better respond to changing expressions; and naturally when shooting sports, fast blackout times are critical for tracking action. The Pentax K7 excels in this respect.
Quote:
For most enthusiasts photography is a hobby. Some enthusiasts get so deep into the speeds and feeds they forget this, and are the first to decry a camera like the Pentax Q. That's fine, and part of the hobby, frankly: comparing, measuring, ranting, and ultimately preferring this or that. We cater to them, happily so. But I'd like to remind enthusiasts like myself that it is a hobby, and if we're not having fun, what are we doing?
Quote:
Shooting at my son's birthday party was one example of conditions in which I'd have to give up on the Pentax K-x's 11-point AF system, solely due to the lack of a viewfinder indication. The problem was that with no indication of the active focus point, I wouldn't catch that the K-x had decided to set focus in the wrong place.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Q at ISO1600 at 02/09/2011 - 17:29

Pentaxophile
Thanks. Nice lens!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on FS SMC Pentax 135mm f/2.5 at 02/09/2011 - 13:39

Pentaxophile
The Q will always fall short of the competition if you count apsc or even mft cameras as the competitors. Dof control will always be lacking and as tiny sensors improve, so will larger ones. The Q's true competition are the lx5 and s95 type cameras, which it competes with on size and ought to beat on IQ owing to the use of interchangeable lenses. It's already better than any Ricoh compact as far as I can see.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Q at ISO1600 at 01/09/2011 - 17:06

Pentaxophile
Yes, the last two are great. You've mastered the panned shots, as shown in the first 6 and your previous sets. I would be really grateful give me a heads up on the next Birmingham track event.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on My First Time On The 'Dangerous' Side Of The Fence at 01/09/2011 - 10:02

Pentaxophile
Welcome Jarrid. Nice camera. Run some films through it and get them scanned so you can upload them to the gallery!

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on hello form south africa at 01/09/2011 - 09:36

Pentaxophile
Like many flat-renters I don't have household insurance, so went for cover from Glover and Howe. I didn't insure the entire value of my kit as I doubt I would ever take it all out with me. It costs about £3.25 per month.

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Equipment Insurance ? at 01/09/2011 - 09:25

Pentaxophile
Once you're used to a Pentax DLSR, you can probably do without trawling through the manuals on future model, except where there's something specific. My K200D manual was in French... I just used my istDL2 manual instead if there was something I needed to know! 90% of it was the same!

Talking of manuals not changing, one of the following illustrations is from the Z70 manual, back in the eighties, and one from the K7...

Comment Image

Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Really k5! at 31/08/2011 - 20:29

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo