All Forum Comments
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Dear Pentax Ricoh at 09/10/2011 - 15:56
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Deleted your photo from the gallery? I don't think so... at 09/10/2011 - 13:15
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Bad review for DA* 16-50mm at 08/10/2011 - 23:47
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Bad review for DA* 16-50mm at 08/10/2011 - 23:09
Slightly disappointed as I thought this was a Mac-bashing thread
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Lost on an apple at 08/10/2011 - 22:06
Internet explorer is hideous but at least it tends to be trouble free!
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Google chrome at 08/10/2011 - 21:56
So it would be possible to use this for concerts (low light) and portrait photogaphy (subject isolation). As shooting wide open at is appropriate for these sorts of photography, the lens can be used in Av mode wide open, avoiding the need to remember to press that green button for stop down metering.
Anyway here are my test shots. It is definitely sharp enough wide open. There is much less coloured bokeh fringing and CA than my 135mm f2.5. All these shots are at f4 in Av mode.




100% crop, no sharpening.

WHAT A BARGAIN!!!
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Pentax M 75-150 f4 First Impressions at 08/10/2011 - 21:36
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on [Mini-Review] My New Pentax K-7 at 08/10/2011 - 18:02
They don't remove anything.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Lens Cleaning at 08/10/2011 - 17:55
I don't think this review will help Pentax sell their DA* lens
Pentaxforums.com lens review
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Bad review for DA* 16-50mm at 08/10/2011 - 14:42


But yes, I agree with Chris - the first priority is an uplift of the current lens line up... e.g. revising the DA*16-50, perhaps improving the kit lens that the K5 etc ship with (how about a WR 16-45mm?)