All Forum Comments
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Is It Natural? at 23/10/2012 - 23:37
2. No it doesn't matter. But I do think that for traditional landscape photography, while it doesn't matter if the photo is slavishly faithful to the scene as recorded, there are limits as to what most people will accept as 'natural' and if you push too far it can be off putting for many people. Whether that's your problem as a photographer or their problem is another matter...
I have read comments by photographers who have 'toned down' colours which they swear were recorded accurately, but which they knew would overwhelm their image or create an impression of artificiality.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Is It Natural? at 23/10/2012 - 20:37
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K-5ii & K-5iis studio test shots at 23/10/2012 - 18:04
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on K-5ii & K-5iis studio test shots at 23/10/2012 - 13:21
I'm never quite sure why people don't just say PentaxForums?
It's not as if you can't mention Amazon, eBay, SRS, etc? And a lot of people seem to be members of both.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Other Forum at 21/10/2012 - 12:37
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Our Great Photo Processing Shootout! at 21/10/2012 - 10:58
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Other Forum at 21/10/2012 - 10:18
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Live View at 20/10/2012 - 19:08
As far as the question about whether our eyes (or brains!) correct colour perception - of course they do. Do you perceive tungsten light as yellow in colour? Course not, but your camera will unless you make a correction to the WB.
David is entitled to edit the scene according to his own recollection and artistic intent, but I'm also entitled to point out that it does not look natural.
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on Our Great Photo Processing Shootout! at 20/10/2012 - 13:13
Comment by Pentaxophile posted on FS: Asahi Pentax SMC f/2.5 - 135mm at 20/10/2012 - 10:58

