paulgee20

Joined: 7th December 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

paulgee20
Nice 'tweak' though David, you must show us all sometime.


Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on St Pat's, Melbourne at 30/11/2010 - 17:47

paulgee20
Hi I-Berg, one of the problems with the verticals on a shot like this is that you are almost always taking the 'window' shot looking up.

This means that you can never really straighten the verticals without losing the true perspective. Personally I dont mind, but that is my view. Still a great shot.

Regards


Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on St Pat's, Melbourne at 30/11/2010 - 07:50

paulgee20
No's 1 and 2 are excellent, particularly No 1, superb composition and clarity.

Well taken

Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on St Pat's, Melbourne at 29/11/2010 - 13:55

paulgee20
Never mind Graham Im already using it........



Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on Sigma 10-20 f.4-5.6.EX DC for sale at 28/11/2010 - 13:57

paulgee20
For sale, as new, no marks or signs of usage. Includes all spacers etc

Approx £79 -99 on the web currently.

First £45 + postage secures.


Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on Tamrac Pro 12 Lens Bridge Bag at 24/11/2010 - 16:53

paulgee20
You do have LBA lol

Cant fault you, appear to have everything covered


Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on I may have LBA, but there are some weaknesses in my lenses, so need some assistance. at 24/11/2010 - 16:48

paulgee20
Hi Trampas

Welcome.


Regards


Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on Hi From Sunny Sussex!! at 21/11/2010 - 14:27

paulgee20
No problem Amin

Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on Profits from Purchases? at 21/11/2010 - 14:24

paulgee20
Sorry John, forgot to clarify that.

Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on How do I know whan a Lens is a macro lens at 21/11/2010 - 10:43

paulgee20
Hi there

If the lens has some/all of these markings is one way: -

Has it got any of the following stamped on it

N/AI or OM or MD, 1.1, (at least 1.1, better than 1.1 improves, I.E. 2.1/5.1

Macrolenses are expected have at least a 1:1 ratio between the image produced and the subject's size. More expensive macro lens can have greater magnifications, such as 5:1, which means the image in the picture will be five times larger than it is in real life.



Then this points you in the right direction


A cheaper option if your budget is really tight at the moment could be: -

Close up lenses (or supplementary lenses) are perhaps the cheapest alternative of getting into Macro Photography on a budget. These small lenses screw into the filter thread of your camera’s existing lens and allow the lens to focus closer than it’s normal minimum focal length. In doing so they allow you to fill more of the frame with your subject.
These lenses often come sold in a set of 3 and are labeled as +1, +2 and +3 etc (with +3 being the largest magnification).

However you do lose focus at infinity and some quality as you are adding an extra element.

Plenty of these can be found fairly cheaply on E Bay or similar: -

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/PENTAX-SAMSUNG-fit-100mm-Macro-Prime-LENS-DSLR-MINT-/16050...


Regards


Paul

Comment by paulgee20 posted on How do I know whan a Lens is a macro lens at 21/11/2010 - 10:18

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo