paulcliff

Joined: 16th February 2011

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

paulcliff
alfpics wrote:
Never been to one of these; interesting set of images!
Thanks Andy,

I can highly recommend it, our kids both really enjoyed it despite be quite young (almost 3 & 1), lots of older kids around us too getting into it.

Away from the arena stuff the rest of the castle and grounds was all decked out with re-enactors, I think they camp on site for the weekend and live as close to the period style as possible, so they're all cooking and cleaning and making things as you walk around.

Really fun day.

Comment by paulcliff posted on The Siege of 1216 at 16/08/2016 - 14:38

paulcliff
Taken at Dover Castle on sunday.

Full set here: link

Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


One of the best re-enactments I've seen in a long time.

Comment by paulcliff posted on The Siege of 1216 at 16/08/2016 - 09:52

paulcliff
Ahh, viewfinder, that's me not paying attention sorry, I'm with you now!

Thanks for the settings Gareth, I'll have a play tonight whilst watching the meteor shower (if the weather is kind to me).

Thanks everyone for your help...results to follow.

Comment by paulcliff posted on K3ii Astrophotography at 11/08/2016 - 16:29

paulcliff
alfpics wrote:
Hi Paul

The problem with long exposures is that any residual light around the viewfinder can get through and onto the sensor. So, eg, if you had a torch on behind the camera whilst you were night shooting, its light would be significantly brighter than what is coming from the sky. There was a thread about this recently
link

All you need is either the cap which came with the camera, although that is fiddly to fit in the field, so a bit of dark cloth or something and leave it there for the whole exposure

Hope that helps
Thanks,

So I need to take 2 exposures, one of the sky and one of the dark cloth? (same exposure length?)

Do I then just combine the images in something?

Comment by paulcliff posted on K3ii Astrophotography at 11/08/2016 - 12:17

paulcliff
alfpics wrote:
Paul - just a thought - did you cover the viewfinder as any stray light could well seep in there during a long exposure.
No I didn't.....didn't know I was supposed to! so that would be for part of the exposure I assume, are there any rules here? Half the exposure....a few seconds?

Comment by paulcliff posted on K3ii Astrophotography at 11/08/2016 - 08:10

paulcliff
Wow what an awesome photo!

What settings if you don't mind me asking?

Comment by paulcliff posted on K3ii Astrophotography at 10/08/2016 - 23:53

paulcliff
This is something I've toyed with in the past but never managed anything decent. Tonight I decided to finally give the astrotracer in the K3ii a go, but to tell the truth I'm fairly lost with it.

Can anyone share their experience with using it or help me in anyway with the general setup?

I basically pointed the camera at the sky, activated GPS and the astrotracer, it told me that 5mins was the maximum, I let it expose for 5mins and got a lovely white photograph of nothing.

I thought I could set my own exposure time, but the UI seems to indicate this deactivates the astrotracer?

In the end I left it in BULB which seemed to indicate the astrotracer was now on and just guessed how long I should expose for. It ended up being 118 seconds, and after some playing in Lightroom I got the following:

Comment Image


So it looks like the astrotracer is definitely working as there are no star trails, but the original image was so over exposed.

My settings:

118s | f2.8 | iso400

Should I be doing something like:

3mins | f10| iso200 ??

Thanks for any help!

Comment by paulcliff posted on K3ii Astrophotography at 10/08/2016 - 23:07

paulcliff
K-x, apologies.

Comment by paulcliff posted on Pentax en français at 29/06/2016 - 18:48

paulcliff
3 images from a few years ago in Paris, taken with a Pentax KX that I no longer own.

Found these 3 when reorganising my pictures and importing to Lightroom.

Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


I've posted my favourite in the gallery also.

Comment by paulcliff posted on Pentax en français at 29/06/2016 - 10:26

paulcliff
£400 seems a little pricey for this considering the 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED WR is currently £279.00 on SRS.

Looking forward to the reviews as I'm always looking to replace my 55-300 DA L with a WR.

Comment by paulcliff posted on New HD PENTAX-DA 55-300mm f/4.5-6.3 ED PLM WR RE at 10/06/2016 - 08:28

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo