MrCynical

Joined: 12th June 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

MrCynical
Anvh wrote:
K10D wrote:
Probably a better choice than a 50mm. Although the 50mm gives a FOV of a 75mm lens, it does not offer the same flattening effect. Hence under the "old" system, a portrait lens was generally in the 80mm to 105mm range.
Pentax has the DA*55 f/1.4 though that would be around the 85mm and that was considered perfect.
However I at least am for the bit longer focal lengths for portrait.
I've used the DFA100 quite a lot for that but that was just slightly to long for my feeling for most shots
I'm in the same situation - I've found the DFA100 to be too long for my needs, and I like the look of the DA*55 a lot but thought it would be a bit strange to get yet another 50mm-ish lens.

EDIT: Also, although I could afford the DA*55 it would be at the top end of what I'm willing to spend and would need to be astonishingly good to persuade me to go that far. I'm open to being persuaded by the legions of DA* owners on here

Comment by MrCynical posted on 70mm limited as a portrait lens at 17/04/2010 - 21:34

MrCynical
Having had no success with my enquiries about 12-24s (at the old price), I've decided that what I'll get instead is... a portait lens

Anyway, my first thought was of course a 50mm f1.4 (either Sigma or Pentax DA*) but I reckoned that a fifth lens to cover 50mm might not be the best use of funds right now. Is the 70mm Limited as good for portraits as it's reputed to be?

Comment by MrCynical posted on 70mm limited as a portrait lens at 17/04/2010 - 19:29

MrCynical
hefty1 wrote:
*ahem* shameless plug *ahem*
Oh yeah, I can just see him getting into a major public sporting event with a rifle stock

Comment by MrCynical posted on Advice Required for 300mm Prime at 16/04/2010 - 14:37

MrCynical
Oggy wrote:
Have a look here (takes a while to load).

As well as the long term effect of grinding away parts of the engines it also can have an immediate effect. It can extinguish the fuel burning in the engine.

This happened years ago when a 747 flew through a cloud of volcanic ash. All four engines shut down at well over 30000ft and when they managed to get them going again they were below 5000ft
The solid stuff (mainly glass I think) in the cloud also knackered the engines to the extent that they all had to be scrapped.

Comment by MrCynical posted on Ashes halt air traffic at 15/04/2010 - 16:59

MrCynical
Anvh wrote:
Also why would a company like Windows with thousands of people not have enough to spare to do the same trick?
This is the company that said "this internet thing won't catch on" (1995) and, worse, released Windows Me. Attempts to analyse the logical basis of their decisions are doomed to fail

Comment by MrCynical posted on Super Software at 13/04/2010 - 23:27

MrCynical
As a student I can get the education or student versions (they are different, believe it or not!), and the context-sensitive thing is making my SBA (software buying addiction, a common affliction in geeks!) tingle. Catch being I doubt 2Gb of RAM is enough to run it on Vista.

Comment by MrCynical posted on Adobe Photoshop CS5, PS CS5 Extended released at 13/04/2010 - 23:23

MrCynical
flossie wrote:
Contact DAE0707 by PM and he'll give you a ring - he sold me a 12-24 for the same price as Walters and said he had a couple more left at the £525 price ("old" stock, but 2 year Pentax Pro warrantee).

Very helpful guy and delivered well boxed and secured by courier next day.

I'm quite enjoying the 12-24, although do tend to be at either one end of it or the other! Watch out for the lens hood if at 12mm though...
Might well do that then - cheers for the tip! If he still has any that would be the best option.

Comment by MrCynical posted on Alternative ultrawide? at 11/04/2010 - 18:17

MrCynical
Mike-P wrote:
It gets my vote just because I wouldn't have the patience to sit in a pitch black forest for nearly 3 hours.
At least we Brits have the advantage, not shared by all of our overseas cousins, that if we want to sit in the forest for three hours the only thing likely to come along and eat us is a band of local neds

EDIT: That picture is fabulous!

Comment by MrCynical posted on Reject Startrail at 11/04/2010 - 18:14

MrCynical
Unfortunately I have just missed out on the last of the reasonably-priced 12-24mm f4s from Walters, so I am now looking at alternatives in this category. I really liked the look of the 12-24, but can't justify spending the ludicrous amounts of money Pentax charge for it nowadays.

Anyway, enough moping, I've listed the various options (with the exception of the 15mm f4, since it isn't that much wider than the 16-45 which I could buy instead, and is over £600). I'm also open to alternate suggestions within the same sort of budget - the Pentax 17-70mm (though it is obviously a standard zoom rather than an ultrawide) has been catching my eye lately despite my strong anti-SDM prejudice, as has the Tamron 28-75 (as a portrait lens).

Comment by MrCynical posted on Alternative ultrawide? at 11/04/2010 - 17:13

MrCynical
Really great photos, I'm torn as to which of the moon ones I like best.

Comment by MrCynical posted on my poor photos taken with my pentax gear at 10/04/2010 - 19:14

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo