All Forum Comments
Comment by MrCynical posted on 70mm limited as a portrait lens at 17/04/2010 - 21:34
Anyway, my first thought was of course a 50mm f1.4 (either Sigma or Pentax DA*) but I reckoned that a fifth lens to cover 50mm might not be the best use of funds right now. Is the 70mm Limited as good for portraits as it's reputed to be?
Comment by MrCynical posted on 70mm limited as a portrait lens at 17/04/2010 - 19:29
Comment by MrCynical posted on Advice Required for 300mm Prime at 16/04/2010 - 14:37
Have a look here (takes a while to load).
As well as the long term effect of grinding away parts of the engines it also can have an immediate effect. It can extinguish the fuel burning in the engine.
This happened years ago when a 747 flew through a cloud of volcanic ash. All four engines shut down at well over 30000ft and when they managed to get them going again they were below 5000ft
Comment by MrCynical posted on Ashes halt air traffic at 15/04/2010 - 16:59
Also why would a company like Windows with thousands of people not have enough to spare to do the same trick?
Comment by MrCynical posted on Super Software at 13/04/2010 - 23:27
Comment by MrCynical posted on Adobe Photoshop CS5, PS CS5 Extended released at 13/04/2010 - 23:23
Contact DAE0707 by PM and he'll give you a ring - he sold me a 12-24 for the same price as Walters and said he had a couple more left at the £525 price ("old" stock, but 2 year Pentax Pro warrantee).
Very helpful guy and delivered well boxed and secured by courier next day.
I'm quite enjoying the 12-24, although do tend to be at either one end of it or the other! Watch out for the lens hood if at 12mm though...
Comment by MrCynical posted on Alternative ultrawide? at 11/04/2010 - 18:17
It gets my vote just because I wouldn't have the patience to sit in a pitch black forest for nearly 3 hours.
EDIT: That picture is fabulous!
Comment by MrCynical posted on Reject Startrail at 11/04/2010 - 18:14
Anyway, enough moping, I've listed the various options (with the exception of the 15mm f4, since it isn't that much wider than the 16-45 which I could buy instead, and is over £600). I'm also open to alternate suggestions within the same sort of budget - the Pentax 17-70mm (though it is obviously a standard zoom rather than an ultrawide) has been catching my eye lately despite my strong anti-SDM prejudice, as has the Tamron 28-75 (as a portrait lens).
Comment by MrCynical posted on Alternative ultrawide? at 11/04/2010 - 17:13
Comment by MrCynical posted on my poor photos taken with my pentax gear at 10/04/2010 - 19:14


Probably a better choice than a 50mm. Although the 50mm gives a FOV of a 75mm lens, it does not offer the same flattening effect. Hence under the "old" system, a portrait lens was generally in the 80mm to 105mm range.
However I at least am for the bit longer focal lengths for portrait.
I've used the DFA100 quite a lot for that but that was just slightly to long for my feeling for most shots
EDIT: Also, although I could afford the DA*55 it would be at the top end of what I'm willing to spend and would need to be astonishingly good to persuade me to go that far. I'm open to being persuaded by the legions of DA* owners on here