All Forum Comments
Comment by Mike-P posted on Another Little Bee at 16/02/2009 - 10:41
Which lenses would you call 'interesting' Mike?
Actually probably something in the AF macro line would be handy as I only have manual lenses (Apart from a Sigma 50mm EX DG which I never use as its too short for my liking).
Comment by Mike-P posted on For Trade - Metz 58 AF-1 at 16/02/2009 - 10:36
It is all boxed and has never actually been used, just opened to make sure the unit was in there.
Looking to trade for something interesting lens wise .. the unit is in the UK and I will be back in less than a fortnight so could sort something out then if anyone is interested.
Comment by Mike-P posted on For Trade - Metz 58 AF-1 at 15/02/2009 - 22:45
Mike-P
Yes he could be legitimate - but why would a private seller have two of those lenses? Or all of the other cameras?
And why hide bidder identities?
There is just something odd ...
I used to hide bidders identities because the phone business on Ebay was full of dodgy characters who used to look at auctions, see who was bidding on what and contact them via ebays private messaging offering them the same phone at a cheaper price. Im sure that happens on other types of auction.
Comment by Mike-P posted on Samsung 16-45 on eBay at 15/02/2009 - 15:19
Mike-P The same comments are on the original auction too and I doubt that it would have been dealt with in 10 minutes. Also, if that was a problem then it would be a relisting - due to non-payment and thus saving fees. The seller has just copied the first auction text for the second.
As for a relisting after a bad auction, I never bothered waiting .. relisting costs peanuts on a auction with no BIN or reserve price, as long as you get the seller fees back thats the main thing.
It takes approx 2 weeks to get the relisting and seller fees back so if you want a reasonable turnover there is no point waiting.
Of course he could be purely legit and all the comments here mean diddly squat.
Comment by Mike-P posted on Samsung 16-45 on eBay at 15/02/2009 - 14:45
Comment by Mike-P posted on Samsung 16-45 on eBay at 15/02/2009 - 14:14
in what way would one be more useful compared to for example the way I have been focusing? By manually moving and focusing on each plane?
If you are happy with just 3 or 4 shots per stack then no, you probably dont need one.
Comment by Mike-P posted on On the path to Macros at 15/02/2009 - 12:54
Comment by Mike-P posted on On the path to Macros at 15/02/2009 - 12:27
I had a play a few months ago and just couldn't get on with it .. I seem to get on better using a lower aperture.
I may have another crack at it as I really didnt give it enough time.
Comment by Mike-P posted on On the path to Macros at 15/02/2009 - 11:50
I must admit when people (That don't have a Pentax) comment about my pictures the colour is always mentioned.
Number 3 is my favourite.
Comment by Mike-P posted on My first pics post at 15/02/2009 - 11:37


I must have disturbed him as he headed straight for me as I was lining up the shot.
Pentax K10D and Vivitar 100mm f2.8 macro.