melness

Joined: 28th May 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

melness
adamjt7 wrote:
I have 2 lenses for sale they are

Sigma 17-70mm f2.8-4.5 £150.00
Sigma 50mm macro f2.8 £150.00

If you buy both i can do u a deal of £260.00 for both

Both lenses are in good condition and are boxed.


Also selling a set of auto extention tubes £30.00
Tamron 70-300mm boxed brand new £70.00 only used once.
2x focal extender(manual) £10.00
Cable remote £5.00

A good set for some one starting out with pentax will sell all individual but will sell the lot for £340.00

Selling due to not requiring any of these as i have swapped brands.
Not sure how things work on here ,bit i'm in the process of selling some kit at the moment .Very interested in the Sigma 17-70 and possibly the the 50mm macro and extension tubes .I'm hoping to sell my kit in the next couple of days ,but i'd understand if you can't wait

Comment by melness posted on Pentax Gear. at 29/12/2009 - 08:05

melness
hefty1 wrote:
melness wrote:
Is it worth persuing the 6 7 and 645 lenses ,just out of interest.
Only if you already have a collection of them, otherwise they won't give any better results on digital than a 35mm lens of similar specification (but will be heavier and less wieldy).
Ok cheers hefty

Comment by melness posted on Older manual/auto lens at 28/12/2009 - 15:45

melness
Is it worth persuing the 6 7 and 645 lenses ,just out of interest .




Regards Sean

Comment by melness posted on Older manual/auto lens at 27/12/2009 - 21:51

melness
Excellent replies folks ,let the research and hunt begin

Comment by melness posted on Older manual/auto lens at 27/12/2009 - 21:01

melness
iceblinker wrote:
Even second-hand 70, 85, 90 and 100mm primes are often quite expensive, unfortunately. The availability-to-demand ratio is not so favourable for those (for buyers!) as it is for 28, 50 and 135mm.
Prices have definitely jumped since i last had Pentax kit thats for sure

Comment by melness posted on Older manual/auto lens at 26/12/2009 - 21:28

melness
Dangermouse wrote:
Bear in mind that there is a crop factor when using film lenses on a DSLR (due to the size of the sensor). Generally you should multiply the lens by around 1.5 to find the 35mm equivalent - the 50mm becomes a 75mm on digital for example, and the 28mm a 42mm.

The 135mm is a bit long therefore for portrait work. I plan to use it for motorsport and anything involving distant subjects in low light, such as concerts.
Yeh was toying with the idea of trying the 135mm for motocross and rally

Comment by melness posted on Older manual/auto lens at 26/12/2009 - 20:55

melness
Thanks everyone for the swift replies .

Yep the Pentax-A 50mm f1.7 looks like it'll find it's way into my bag,had the 50mm f2 before was impressed by it greatly.I imagine the The Pentax-M 135mm f3.5 would make a great portrait lens .What about between these two anything you'd recommend . Just looking for general information just now so i can do a bit of research ,these lenses are one of the main reasons i moved back to Pentax ,just love the idea of the 20/30 yr old lens working on a modern DSLR and getting great if not better results than the modern day equivalent ,i'm the same with the old hand tools and machinery ,it fascinates me no end .

Comment by melness posted on Older manual/auto lens at 26/12/2009 - 20:41

melness
Hi,merry Xmas to all.

I've just recently moved back to the Pentax brand equipment ,bought myself K10 and kit lens for now.

Basically i'm after some pointers regarding sourcing the excellent older lenses pentax produced ,ie.. 50mm ,200mm and in between these ,also i wouldn't mind trying out other Pentax fit lenses ,longer zooms/primes .I used to have a list of sites for this, alas i no longer do ,so any advise on what will work,and what's not worth bothering about .Whilst i'm on here,are the mirror lenses worth a punt ,i'm on a tightish budget for now .

Thanks for looking

Comment by melness posted on Older manual/auto lens at 26/12/2009 - 19:31

melness
Before i changed to canon (now pentax again)i had the sigma 24-70f2.8 ,i thought it was a cracker of a lens ,great walk about and i also used it for motocross .In nice bright conditions i reckon it would be hard to fault and to be honest, colours were vibrant ,on dull days it's not that bad either ,IQ in my experience was 9 1/2 out of 10 .F3.5 upwards mine was tack sharp

Comment by melness posted on Sigma 24-70 mm F2.8 EX DG at 23/12/2009 - 20:00

melness
edumad wrote:
As part of my "triming" of my photographic collection, I've got a lot of bits and pieces to let go, some for free
First come, first served.
You pay postage though.

Lets start with a Tokina SD 70-210mm F4 KA mount. In good nick, some dust specks inside, nothing to bad, back cap only.
Where about are you so i can work out postage,i stay up near Inverness in Scotland ,and is this lens fully functional,i've just purchased a K10D so i'm curious ...Ooops too late

Comment by melness posted on Freebies at 13/12/2009 - 11:01

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo