All Forum Comments
Comment by McGregNi posted on Pentax, or ?? at 13/09/2014 - 17:35
Comment by McGregNi posted on Baltic Gateshead at 13/09/2014 - 13:38
Comment by McGregNi posted on Newcastle Quayside at 12/09/2014 - 18:16
I don't think the standard set of processing adjustments is really 'digitally faking it'. And of course Adams and all the others had to 'process' after the event of capture in the camera, so I agree with the point that it is really just the same. My own view is that, (apart from camera JPEGs where the photographer has very carefully set up all the custom settings for the image precisely), it is a requirement to carry out 'optimising' adjustments after capture - that is an inherent part of the exercise, and absolutely for RAW.
Here I see some nice summery lakes images, all good views and pleasing to look at ... but the conditions and angle of light to the lens has reduced contrast and tonal range, and weakened colours. The example that Philip has shown has improved this I think - it would be interesting to know more about the specific adjustments you made MrB .... I think it may be a little too sharp now, perhaps the softness of the original should be retained in the far distant areas? This could be done with layers and masking to hide the adjustment effects further back into the scene, keeping the foreground areas with the full effect.
Comment by McGregNi posted on Lake Garda - the lake! at 12/09/2014 - 17:33
Like them all neil, especially the last two in the first block, lovely warm lighting and nice layers...
Thanks Jules, yes I was attracted to the layering effect going into the scenes and was happy to exaggerate this with the telephoto effect. Thanks also xbow and Russ. I think I was attracted to the highlights reflecting of the buildings in the 2nd, and thought it added to it all somehow? But we all see different things, and its a good point about the' industry' going on there!
Comment by McGregNi posted on Poole Harbour ... Dawn at 12/09/2014 - 14:54
Comment by McGregNi posted on Poole Harbour ... Dawn at 12/09/2014 - 07:44
Comment by McGregNi posted on Swanage Harbour, an Overview at 11/09/2014 - 22:02
Thanks also to Algi for so ably demonstrating the single image approach, although this has the obvious disadvantage of the quite major cropping as a result.
So people, now we have two versions to compare ... My intentional distorted original, with it's law of physics defying gravity resistant water, ir our MrB's clever stitch up job. Which has the most successful elements that make the better image overall???
Comment by McGregNi posted on Swanage Harbour, an Overview at 11/09/2014 - 20:49
Comment by McGregNi posted on Arundel WWT, Sept 7 at 11/09/2014 - 20:00
I took a range of views and exposures with the Pentax 'M' 75-150 f4, and mostly shot at f11 or f13. All with the K7, tripod mounted, remote control shooting & mirror-up operation.
Thanks for taking a peek!
1.

2.

3.

4.

5. And finally the bigger picture ... from the same place with the Samyang 14mm f2.8, shot at f13 - taken later at about 7am after I'd been shooting the other way for a while into Swanage Bay and just before packing it in and heading for breakfast!

Hope you enjoyed them, as I sure did really enjoy being there and taking them!!
Comment by McGregNi posted on Poole Harbour ... Dawn at 11/09/2014 - 17:24


It anything, I thought most people with other brands tended towards a different sort of system as their 'other' .... A mirrorless or compact quite popular for when they don't want to carry a DSLR and lenses.