All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on Aaaargh!!!! No! No! No!...... at 13/03/2006 - 20:30
Personally I'd go with the Pentax. It's a lovely flash (in fact, I wouldn't mind another!).
It's available new at £149:
http://www.microglobe.co.uk/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=1570
The Sigma is the same price. It does have swivel head, and more power. Not sure if there are any other differences.
However, with wireless the swivel is not relevant, and personally I haven't had any power issues using the AF360. All the usual modes are there, plus a whole heap of other stuff you may or may not use
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on AF-360FGZ vs Sigma EF500 EG Super vs ? at 13/03/2006 - 15:29
just another question, which colour profile do you use in Photoshop, the profile which is embedded in the pictures or the monitor profile (the profile created by WiziWyg)?
One very quick test is to have the browser open, copy an image from the web, and paste as sRGB into Photoshop (Ctrl-N, ensure sRGB is chosen, OK, then Ctrl-V to paste). The browser and Photoshop should look identical
Hope that helps!
Don: the following mini review might be useful, I'm not sure:
http://www.thedigitalstory.com/blog/2006/03/huey_screen_calibrat.html
I still think you need a fairly controlled ambient lighting to do proper colour workflow... but I'm open to being convinced otherwise
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on RAW vs. JPEG at 16/03/2006 - 21:50
Comment by MattMatic posted on RAW vs. JPEG at 15/03/2006 - 14:44
I have noticed that setting the right contrast and brightness is better done with the graphics driver controls then with the monitor settings.
Then, get the actual monitor brightness and contrast as close as you can. On some displays (like my tablet PC) there's no setting for contrast. So, I have to leave that stage in WiziWYG. The most important settings are the gamma settings and the choice of curve type.
Later I'll post a thread about how to setup WiziWYG
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on RAW vs. JPEG at 15/03/2006 - 13:53
Your image does have a huge red colourcast - on my Spyder 2 calibrated LCDs (and on the WiziWYG calibrated ones).
I've not seen WiziWYG get it that wrong, unless you don't do the gamma setup correctly, or pick the wrong curve type (you should be using "Generic LCD", and pick D65, and 2.2gamma).
I suggest you get hold of a test print (from somewhere like Photobox.co.uk) and compare the print with an onscreen/online version.
From where I'm sitting your images are out of balance... a long way. Your image: http://i.pbase.com/o4/82/642882/1/57259495.IMGP0631.JPG is red, red, red. And my correction: http://www.pbase.com/image/57265288 is not far off - the skin tones have some hints of green, but some of that is down to the sensor noise and a good clean up will take a little more time. But the stripy shirt is balanced.
If you don't believe me, check the colour picker tool in PS. What looks like a white or grey stripe on the shirt is R:178, G:137, B:91. That's red in anyone's book (my version is 232,220,20
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on RAW vs. JPEG at 15/03/2006 - 12:25
With it you can calibrate an LCD fairly accurately by eye.
I have Spyder 2 calibrated LCDs at work, and your images definitely need work
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on RAW vs. JPEG at 15/03/2006 - 10:40
http://www.pbase.com/image/57265288
1) Added a curves adjustment layer. Brought up the RGB channel to lighten, then went into Red (first) and brought down, then corrected G and B channels to roughly colour balance
2) Added a Colour Balance adjustment layer and brought the colour balance more in line.
3) Noise reduced the image (PS-CS2 Reduce Noise, but would have used NeatImage on an original full size JPG)
4) Added a further curves adjustment layer to improve the lighting.
I'm not 100% happy with it, but it took about 5 min, and you should always take a break before double checking colour work
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on RAW vs. JPEG at 14/03/2006 - 22:03
Here's the tutorial I was thinking of:
http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/17164.html
Definitely worth reading!!
and this one turned up too:
http://www.bairarteditions.com/pages/tutorials/photoshop/cblevels.html
Hope that helps!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on RAW vs. JPEG at 13/03/2006 - 10:25
I'll try and dig out a tutorial link or two
It'd be better still if you could email me a JPG and I'll verify the results for you (doesn't have to be large, say 500pixels).
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on RAW vs. JPEG at 13/03/2006 - 09:53


Aaaargh!
There was this thread a while back:
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1831
Hope that helps!
Matt