All Forum Comments
http://www.ephotozine.com/equipment/tests/testdetail.cfm?test_id=476
I still want/need/desire one
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on K10D news at 15/09/2006 - 13:27
http://blogs.shintak.info/archive/2006/09/03/29003.aspx
Babelfish translation:
* Image element of 1020 ten thousand pixel PAS-C size
* Hardware hand wobble revision (CCD shift system)
* Dust reduction function
* 3 scenes/connected copying function of second
* RAW+JPG record is possible
* SDHC corresponding SD memory card slot
* Lithium ion battery or single 3 electric batteries
* Full metal body of dustproof drip-proof
* It corresponds to the ultrasonic motor with the KAF lens mount
* Interchangeable focusing screen
* Finder of pentaprism
* 11 point side spurs AF
* $849
That "3 electric batteries" is odd. If they've used 3x AA then it'll be lighter, but it'll give probs with the travel chargers which charge 2 or 4 cells.
RAW+JPG is also a very welcome addition
and this: http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=102992&forum_id=80
Which says 3.3 frames per second JPG up the capacity of the card
Still digging...
Of course, it could all be here say (or is that heresy!)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on K10D news at 11/09/2006 - 15:06
Daniel - yes, the unlimited frame buffer would be rather nice, but for me the extended dynamic range and adjustment is just, so, so, so welcome
Could be a while before it hits the streets though, and maybe a little longer until Phase One get C1 sorted to support it properly
But, like George, I'm queuing up for one Shall soon be ebaying a load of bits to help finance it
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on K10D news at 11/09/2006 - 10:23
Analog image processor: http://www.nucoretech.com/nu3/images/80_downloads/pb_ndx2240.us.pdf
Digital processor: http://www.nucoretech.com/nu3/images/80_downloads/pb_sip2290.us.pdf
Just hope this isn't pure speculation... it's sounding almost too good to be true
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on K10D news at 11/09/2006 - 09:38
This is exactly the feature I was after
22-bit ADC with 16-bit output - cowabunga!
To be honest I didn't even need any more pixels, but with anit-shake, higher (and adjustable) dynamic range, dust removal, and weather sealed body... I just need to get my sticky fingers on one
Many thanks for the heads-up Gwyn - that's made my Monday morning!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on K10D news at 11/09/2006 - 09:11
That's 100Mp per square inch
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on 100mp camera.. at 11/09/2006 - 13:50
My 3 year old *ist-D now has probably ten or so pixels. It had none when I bought it. More show up when using long exposures, and/or using higher ISO settings. Fortunately I shoot in RAW and Capture One LE usally automatically removes them all - so I never have to worry too much.
However, when using JPG you are stuck with them (excuse the pun) and end up having to use the healing brush (in Photoshop CS or Elements 3).
Sorry if that's not much help!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Stuck Pixels at 08/09/2006 - 14:47
(i.e. set preference to subRed)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Where am I? at 07/09/2006 - 13:21


(Including weather seals, shake reduction etc).
http://www.ephotozine.com/news/fullnews.cfm?NewsID=3340
Matt