All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on K10D shipped and in user hands at 06/12/2006 - 21:09
http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/
and via http://www.pbase.com/dlcmh/pentax_k10d
Getting very itchy fingers now
(Reckon that ePhotozine will have a review very, very soon! Here's one shot, though off WB somewhat: http://www.ephotozine.com/gallery/showlargepic.cfm?photoid=774768 )
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on K10D shipped and in user hands at 05/12/2006 - 21:18
http://nedbunnell.blogspot.com/2006/11/few-k10d-snapshots.html
here:
http://imageevent.com/wlleven/k10dtest/1600
and here:
http://laree.smugmug.com/gallery/2146307/3/111480221
...and here:
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fdc.watch.impress.co.jp%2Fcd...
(Translated)
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on K10D shipped and in user hands at 22/11/2006 - 11:45
I know there's a "LittleCMS" command line tool that will do colour space conversion. I've tried it with ProAMImaging's profile and the results are just fine.
I'll see if I can dig up a link or two
EDIT: It's "jpegicc" which should be part of the Linux distro. You can edit in AdobeRGB or sRGB and then use jpegicc to map into their profile. Use the "Perceptual" intent and enable black point compensation.
e.g. Assuming sRGB is the input colour space
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Commercial Digital Printing at 20/11/2006 - 15:32
For pro-quality prints - www.proamimaging.com
Crazy prices, very quick turn around and absolutely stunning quality. The best thing is they are fully colour managed so you have to prepare the colour space of the file (which you need Photoshop for) but that means there are zero surprises when it comes to colour.
Absolutely top notch stuff
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Commercial Digital Printing at 18/11/2006 - 12:43
Comment by MattMatic posted on Sorry folks at 16/11/2006 - 21:34
I would prefer a filter on the front to protect the front element...
You'd be surprised just how hard the SMC coating is Having had these experiences I'm running without filters now. Makes you a little more careful too
Regarding quality:
Build quality - yes, the 16-45 is better. Much more solid, and the slip-clutch focus ring is great.
Image quality - as John mentions the 16-45 has the edge.
However, I still love the 24-90 on the DSLR If I have a two lens setup I take the 12-24 and 24-90, if I can only take one it's the 16-45. For portraits the 24-90 can be a beauty at 90mm.
I think you'd better start saving
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on 16-45 vs 24-90 at 16/11/2006 - 09:26
Places like Ikea and Homebase also do very cheap dimmable halogen lamps - these are great for closeups, but are probably not up to the job for group sittings.
Personally, especially if I go to someone else's house to take portraits, I'll stick to "cool" flash
Alternatively, I did see a great result with someone using available window light, some kitchen foil covered pieces of card, and some white sheets of polystyrene. The result was superb too!
The bottom line is - you've got to experiment, experiment, experiment!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Studio lighting questions at 16/11/2006 - 12:48
It depends what you want to do and what you have already... I have a pair of Pentax flash guns (AF360 & AF540) that work a treat. I've got a fairly cheap Hama brolley that has a flash hot shoe mounting. I mount a flash on that on a cheap tripod and use fully manual mode and get great results.
If you want to do a reasonable amount of studio type work, I would suggest investigating the Elinchrom DLite2 kit. Probably a bit more than the Jessops kit but has the following advantages:
* Fast recharge time
* Consistent light output and quality
* Fully adjustable light output
* Built in slave triggers (so you don't need wires to synchronise)
* Supplied soft-boxes.
www.theflashcentre.co.uk is a good place to start looking
( http://www.theflashcentre.com/d-lite-2-two-head-kit-i547.html )
If you're not going to do a lot of studio style work, then you might get away with an AF360, a brolley, and a reflector or two. That at least gives you the flexibility for "normal" flash work too.
Oh, and of course, you'll need to schedule in some serious practice before you do the family shot Find a willing subject who doesn't mind hanging around and just try out settings, angles, positions etc. The studios make it look really easy because they do it all the time - if you've not tried it before you may find it a little harder than you expected
There should be an article on flash in the Pentax User magazine coming up very soon...
Hope that helps!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Studio lighting questions at 16/11/2006 - 09:34
www.russellbrown.com - some absolutely fabulous videos. You'll need broadband though
www.ephotozine.com - some great tips in the "Techniques" section (including some I've authored)
www.photon.me.uk - I have a few tutorials on layers and such like
www.retouchpro.com - some serious Photoshop techniques here.
There are plenty of others if you Google for them
Hope that helps!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Online Photoshop Course at 16/11/2006 - 09:54


http://www.ephotozine.com/equipment/tests/testdetail.cfm?test_id=492
Verdict
Pentax are back! With the possible exception of frame rate, made up for in part with the Shake-reduction and dual RAW capability, this camera is up there with Nikon’s D200 and Canon’s 30D. Packed with features that have been well thought out and are easily accessible in a body that has been built to withstand the pressures of hard use in typically English climates it has a lot going for it. If their lens line-up takes a similar leap in the next twelve months, Pentax will be back toe-to-toe with the big boys. This is a serious advanced amateur or semi-pro camera.
Matt