All Forum Comments
Comment by MattMatic posted on Mostly Blue at 02/06/2009 - 17:05
i'd like to explore portraits more.
(Check out the last few of my gallery shots for flowers with the 50-135 )
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Lens Price Increases! at 02/06/2009 - 14:35
The legend that is Chris at SRS is keeping a DA*50-135 at it's current price for me
Everything I take with this lens just pops out of the shot! It's 3D rendering is sublime, and the sharpness is phenomenal. My most used lens now... even the 50/1.4 is hardly getting a look in
Enjoy it when you get it!!!
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Lens Price Increases! at 02/06/2009 - 14:08
(I did take a few seconds of 21fps JPG on the K20D with my son on the trampoline... but haven't had time to movie-fy it)
Back OT... the video on the K7 looks very impressive from those preproduction versions!
Comment by MattMatic posted on video taken with the K7 at 02/06/2009 - 11:18
i.e. there is no defined "correct" brightness
The basic "matrix/shaper" profile can be particularly disappointing - as you described.
I've had MUCH more success when creating cLUT (Colour Look Up Table) style files. Argyll will do them both (but the cLUT is a fair bit more work)
The difference was astonishing
(But then, as I found out, not all "colour managed" apps can handle cLUT profiles. Some can only handle matrix/shaper profiles )
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Who calibrates their screen at 01/06/2009 - 17:38
FF is arguably cutting edge for '35mm DSLRs' so pentax either joins the fight or turns it's (sic) face to the wall......there IS no in between ground.
Comment by MattMatic posted on The K7 price is making me want to buy the K20D !! at 01/06/2009 - 15:55
Works an absolute dream and produces the best profiles I've ever used
(But does take an absolute age to do!)
I now have multiple LCD monitors that actually agree! (brightness variances excepted)
It's worth noting that the Argyll CMS software will work with even cheaper hardware - like the Huey and Spyder (regular). So you can have pro-quality calibration on a budget (but it is command line driven... although not too difficult to do!).
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on Who calibrates their screen at 01/06/2009 - 15:51
Comment by MattMatic posted on flash (exposure) time at 01/06/2009 - 15:48
so there is no cutting off power involved
Even a fully manual flash will charge the capacitor fully. When you set 1/4 power the flash will achieve that by letting power into the xenon tube for a shorter period of time.
Think of it like a bath full of water (the capacitor), and the plug hole (the flash tube). If you open the plug hole for a long time then the whole bath will empty. Open the plug for a shorter time and less power is discharged.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on flash (exposure) time at 01/06/2009 - 14:24
So it may be a balancing act of lower ambient light + lower flashgun power + higher ISO + aperture control.
You need to balance all four (essentially ignore shutter speed) to find the "sweet spot" that will give you low flash duration with enough light and sufficient sensitivity to get the image you want.
Matt
Comment by MattMatic posted on flash (exposure) time at 01/06/2009 - 13:41

