All Forum Comments
Comment by MarkD posted on Q Image Quality? (Image heavy) at 07/06/2012 - 22:42
The Q is a lovely little camera but for me the picture quality isn't up to the price tag and it so nearly could have been!!
I was hoping it could be a digital Rollei 35......alas, no.
Comment by MarkD posted on Olympus got it right, Pentax got it wrong at 03/06/2012 - 00:23
Just as well as I'd totally forgotten about the blank frame bit.
Comment by MarkD posted on How to do 'double exposures' on film... (MX) at 03/06/2012 - 00:08
take the first exposure. then while holding down the little film rewind button under the camera cock the shutter . Hopefully it will not pull out any more film and you will be good for the second exposure on the same frame. (You may also need to hold the rewind handle in place as you wind on with the rewind button pressed, just to make sure no more film comes out.)
I think it tells you how do do it in the manual. I'm sure there's an on line one somewhere you should be able to look up.
Comment by MarkD posted on How to do 'double exposures' on film... (MX) at 03/06/2012 - 00:05
I think there's a common misunderstanding about the logic of the Q. People have been asking for years for a digital equivalent of the Auto 110, which used tiny 110 film format. The Q is exactly that and offers what many users on this forum asked for.
The 110 frame size is 17x13 (mm) the Q is 6x4.5. Noise and depth of field are both compromised by this. I think they missed a trick. (badly)
To me this is why the Q is not a digital 110.
Comment by MarkD posted on Olympus got it right, Pentax got it wrong at 02/06/2012 - 23:39
I agree they got the Q wrong by going for such a small sensor. Even with the current pricing I would still take a Canon s100 or Lumix LX5 in preference. They got everything right on the Q except the sensor size and price.( IMHO )
The K-01 is let down by the lack of articulating screen. It would be a great choice for video if it had that - and some more pancake lenses ready at launch.
Comment by MarkD posted on Olympus got it right, Pentax got it wrong at 02/06/2012 - 17:33
Highly recommended extras would be pegs to hang and weight the drying neg afterwards ( clothes pegs will do but the Patterson weighted film clips are very good - heavy one at the bottom!) and squeegee tongs to wipe water drips away and prevent drying marks.
Check what temperature your cold tap water is. Often it is surprisingly close to the recommended temps and that will make life much easier. All the chemical makers websites have temperature adjustment graphs. These show how much you need to adjust timings depending on temperature.
The hardest part is loading the film spiral in the pitch dark and under a duvet!
Best advice I can give is get everything prepared first and don't panic too much over temperatures and timings.
Comment by MarkD posted on B&W developing help for a film newbie at 24/05/2012 - 07:34
I agree that the glass situation needs to be addressed. They need some seriously good long glass. The other area where Pentax loose out is sports photography. Better AF and fast long glass is a must.
Comment by MarkD posted on Pentax Ricoh future at 22/05/2012 - 15:39
Comment by MarkD posted on i'm a pentaxian from korea. at 28/04/2012 - 07:49
Bargain price too!
Ho hum.
Comment by MarkD posted on For Sale: Pentax DA 21mm Limited Lens, BOXED at 06/04/2012 - 19:56


All the black and white stuff I've seen from the Q looks great. The colour pics have been much more variable. I do like it and if I was given one with the fixed prime I'd use it - a LOT! But if I was spending my hard earned money I'd still go for the Canon S100.
It is a cute little camera and every time I see one on display in a shop I just want to pick it up. I'd love it to do well but I think they've missed the boat now. .....Unless there's a Q2 on the way.
But if there is, Pentax, PLEASE, no silly prices again.