All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on Macro shots at 19/02/2006 - 08:21
Impressive, if a little fuzzy at the edges. Roughly how far from the lens was the subject ? I'm guessing it would be only a few centimetres, or maybe even millimetres away.
Regards, Pete.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Macro shots at 19/02/2006 - 00:16
I'm planning to retire to the sun very soon and whilst I'm still earning a crust I'm buying up the range of lenses that I always wanted, but couldn't afford previously, nor did I have the time to use them. I'll rationalise my collection later and offer the ones I don't want to keep back on eBay. Whilst all my cameras, with the exception of my beloved Super-A, are AF bodies I do like the build quality of the older MF lenses, SMC-A variant preferred but not essential. Apart from the 28-80 Macro Zoom that is, mine fell apart.
The later F & FA versions seem to be too 'plasticy'. That said, they are a lot lighter than the older metal bodied lenses and if you pick the right one, the build quality and the glass are probably very similar. I have read somewhere that the plastic (or polycarbonate) lens bodies might actually be better than metal because of its inherent temperature stability.
Comment by Mannesty posted on ASAHI PENTAX SMC 50mm F1:1.2 at 20/02/2006 - 11:00
Thanks for that, I bought both lenses and I'm certainly looking forward to receiving them. I thought your pricing was spot on, if a little underpriced (hence they sold very quickly) for todays lively market in the better Pentax lenses. The current range of DSLR's from Pentax and the ease of buying on eBay has increased their second hand value dramatically of late. FWIW, I will be using these lenses with my MZ-S and istD cameras over the next few weeks (as long as they arrive on Tuesday as promised ) in Spain when for once I hope to have plenty of time for piccy taking.
General info: I also found a SMC-F 100mm 1:2.8 Macro at Ffordes for not much money, cheaper than they are going for on eBay anyway. It remains to be seen what condition its in but they described it as 'signs of use', which is a tad generalistic.
Comment by Mannesty posted on ASAHI PENTAX SMC 50mm F1:1.2 at 20/02/2006 - 09:59
Comment by Mannesty posted on ASAHI PENTAX SMC 50mm F1:1.2 at 19/02/2006 - 17:20
Anyway, if you find you don't like it . . . I can tell you where you can sell it quite easily
If its still there in an hour I might have a go myself ! ! ! My wallet just groaned . . . and my credit card has done a runner.
Comment by Mannesty posted on ASAHI PENTAX SMC 50mm F1:1.2 at 19/02/2006 - 11:47
Comment by Mannesty posted on ASAHI PENTAX SMC 50mm F1:1.2 at 19/02/2006 - 00:28
I have the 3 manual focus 50's now, 1.2, 1.4, and 1.7 in a mixture of A, M, and now it appears, K versions. I think I can live without the 1:2 version. All I need now is the time to use them, too busy working at the moment unfortunately.
Pete.
Comment by Mannesty posted on ASAHI PENTAX SMC 50mm F1:1.2 at 18/02/2006 - 22:53
Thanks again for the tip, Pete.
Comment by Mannesty posted on ASAHI PENTAX SMC 50mm F1:1.2 at 18/02/2006 - 22:37
1, 2, 3, 1+2, 1+3, 2+3, 1+2+3 = 7 different combinations, 8 if you count no tubes at all (but that's silly).
What am I missing ? ? ?
Comment by Mannesty posted on Some people are SOOOoooooo thick! at 19/02/2006 - 11:33


I know that there is a special ring light adapter, and I've tried to make something similar without success so far. Or did you use the tried and trusted duct tape solution