All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on Bellows A + Takumar 100mm bellows lens at 20/03/2006 - 13:04
If you need a longer lens, I can recommend the Sigma 135-400mm APO zoom. It produces absolutely amazing results.
Comment by Mannesty posted on DL question about hockey. at 20/03/2006 - 10:38
how do you set the frequency on the IST D then? can't find anything in the manual about it...
Comment by Mannesty posted on AF360 FGZ FLASHGUN at 18/03/2006 - 18:35
It is fully functional (P-TTL, Wireless etc) with all of the above mentioned cameras and works in TTL mode with the older SLR's.
The head tilts for bounce flash, but does not swivel. The AF-500FTZ is a more powerful gun which has a tilt 'n swivel head but is less compatible with the newer cameras as, amongst other things, it doesn't do wireless mode.
Comment by Mannesty posted on AF360 FGZ FLASHGUN at 18/03/2006 - 13:48
Comment by Mannesty posted on video downloading at 17/03/2006 - 16:11
Comment by Mannesty posted on Question for moderators at 17/03/2006 - 16:04
What happened that day that hasn't happened before, or since ?
Comment by Mannesty posted on Question for moderators at 17/03/2006 - 11:12
The lens stops down well mechanically and it seems to be in near perfect condition, better than many of the newer K mount lenses I have purchased recently.
The lens is cocked into its wide open position for composition and focussing, where it locks. The shutter mechanism is then supposed to strike the releasing pin for stopping down 'automatically'.
I can use the lens manually with no problem and I'll be trying it out on some static subjects this weekend on the ist-D, though it's a bit long for portraiture on the DSLR's.
The only real issue I have is that if the lens is mounted on a K mount body using the M42 adapter and the lens is inadvertantly cocked, it must be removed from the camera to uncock it.
John, I accept your point about using the newer M and A series lenses but at this focal length (85mm, 100mm, 105mm) they are as rare as rocking horse manure and if you do find one the price is outrageous. I was looking for a cheaper (my 'Minister for the Interior' insists), if less convenient alternative. There are some lovely Takumars to be had and they are much cheaper than the newer ones.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Auto-Takumar lenses ? at 17/03/2006 - 18:09
I recently bought a few Takumar lenses and one of them is an Auto-Takumar 105mm 1:2.8 which I was rather hoping to use as a portrait lens but I can't make it work on any of my Pentax cameras (Super-A, P30, ist-D, ist-DS, MZ-6, MZ-S). I think this may be because modern Pentax SLR's (my oldest is a Super-A) lack the diaphragm release mechanism. I can 'cock' the diaphragm such that it is fully open for composure and focussing but the diaphragm does not stop down when the shutter is released. If I remove the lens and press the diaphragm release pin, it releases OK.
Am I correct in assuming that an older Pentax camera is required to use this lens ? If so it'll be back on ebay shortly as I don't want to u se the older cameras, excellent as I know they are.
Out of interest, what would be the latest camera that could use this lens? Can any K mount camera with a K-M adapter ring be used or would it need a generic M42 threaded body?
Comment by Mannesty posted on Auto-Takumar lenses ? at 17/03/2006 - 11:00
f sound from enough
i sound from women
sh sound from station
Back to topic and a recommendation for your Super Program. You perhaps ought to have it serviced and have the light seals for the rear cover replaced, and the mirror buffer foam also.
I bought a Super-A recently - european version of the Super Program and very cheap - I thought. All of the foam rubber parts mentioned above were crumbling to dust. Bits of the foam even got behind the focussing screen.
I had it serviced including the changing of those items, put a new back on it as the original was badly scratched from a belt buckle or similar, and now I have an almost perfect example of possibly the best of the ME/A series of metal bodied Pentax cameras. The eventual price was nearer £100.00 but it is a great camera, a replacement for my original which became unrepairable.
Comment by Mannesty posted on My god! Things have really changed... at 23/04/2006 - 09:32


Can somebody tell me if the Takumar M42 100mm Bellows lens can be used succesfully on a Pentax Bellows A (K mount) with an M42/K adapter together with an ist D or DS. I particularly need to know if the aperture ring will be effective (Does it have manual diaphragm)
The Bellows A has no electrical contacts anyway so manual metering will be needed I guess.
Is it a 'flat field' lens ?
What would be the best modern equivalent. I have a Pentax-F 100mm macro lens (brilliant piece of glass, if you have the opportunity, buy one), is there any point in fitting that to a bellows unit for greater magnification?
Your leaned opinions gratefully received and thanks in anticipation.