All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on Adobe Photoshop Elements or Capture One for RAW ? at 13/05/2006 - 09:43
Just out of interest, where have you bought them from? I got my 16-45 from Park Cameras but I've ordered the 12-24 from TechDirekt. Park delivered next day, TechDirekt order is on 2 week delivery ! ! ! They were out of stock at the time, great price though at around £450'ish. Well I think so, If you got yours much cheaper . . . I don't want to know.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Wedding Photography Tips at 01/05/2006 - 16:13
Comment by Mannesty posted on Possible Bargain at 02/05/2006 - 17:35
Comment by Mannesty posted on Possible Bargain at 02/05/2006 - 16:45
I have a few Pentax bits for sale too if anybody is interested, view them at http://search.ebay.co.uk/_W0QQsassZmannestyQQhtZ-1
I've got to recoup the money I spent on Brian's AF140C, beautiful ring flash Brian, thanks. I hope you can purchase those excellent lenses soon.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Possible Bargain at 01/05/2006 - 15:40
I'm hoping that we *ist-D owners will get some of the firmware advances that are going into the *ist-D2 passed on to us in the form of a firmware upgrade, just as DS owners did when the DS2 was released. I think Pentax owes us that at least for all the feedback and wish lists we've given to them
Comment by Mannesty posted on New pentax models at 02/05/2006 - 12:29
the CCD has a much higher noise level than a full frame Canon 35mm sized chip.
Given the noise issues with the Sony 6.1 meg CCD used in our Pentax digitals, some serious changes in design will have had to have been used in a 10 Meg chip and a greater than 60% increase in pixel density. 10 - 6.1 = 3.9, so the increase in density = 63.93% when expressed as a percentage of the original 6.1.
I am assuming of course that the new camera will have an APS-C sized sensor. If not, I and several others here have perhaps wasted a lot of money on DA lenses.
As for the digital 645, I seem to remember reading somewhere that its sensor is a full-sized 6 x 4.5 - if I can find where I read it I'll post a link. But then, it could have been in that dream I had where Tesco were giving away 645D's with a box of cornflakes. Just my luck . . . they'd sold out of cornflakes
Comment by Mannesty posted on New pentax models at 30/04/2006 - 15:00
Check this thread from February 2006 https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2289&highlight=645d
To answer you question, there is a 99.9999% probability that the *ist-D replacement (I'm guessing it'll be called *ist-D2) will retain the APS-C sized sensor. What will be interesting is its 'noise' ellimination performance at medium/low light levels and medium/high ISO settings.
The 645D will probably be far too expensive for most of us on this forum, but wait 'til they start appearing on Ebay in 10-15 years time. It's imminent arrival has definitely influenced the price of used 645 lenses.
Comment by Mannesty posted on New pentax models at 30/04/2006 - 13:49


Open the foreground shot in PS and use the Extract Tool to 'cutout' the part of the foreground that you want to keep. This will then appear on its own layer with a transparent background. The extract tool works best with subjects having a well defined/contrasting edge. Hairy animals are more difficult.
Open your background shot as another layer beneath your foreground shot.
Alternatively you can use layer masking. Open both pics on 2 different layers with the foreground on top, then choose the appropriate tools/options to gradually reveal your background.
Lack of time prevents my giving detailed 'simple' instructions. Have a play with both and see how you get on.