All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on blow out skys - how to solve the problem?? at 21/11/2007 - 12:26
Regards,
Comment by Mannesty posted on Omni bounce diffuser at 21/11/2007 - 20:59
You should expect to get reasonably close to your subject with the cloth diffusers.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Omni bounce diffuser at 21/11/2007 - 20:10
You will have seen pro's use these in news footage, and they are pointed directly at their subject, not bounced from another surface.
The omni-bounce reduces the light reaching the subject by up to 2 stops, as does bouncing flash from a ceiling. To do both, would effectively reduce the light reaching the subject by 3-4 stops, less than ideal (unless you have a very powerful flash head).
That said, I think Sto-fen recommend tilting an omni-bounce equipped flash at 45 degrees to the subject (indoors) so that the subject receives some direct light, and some bounced light. Outdoors where there is no bouncable (if that's a real word) surface, it should be aimed directly at the subject.
The gold coloured one simply produces a 'warmer' light. They also sell a gree'ish one for a cooler lighting effect.
For clarity, perhaps you could post some images of the bits you have received, or supply a link for viewing the items/images on the web.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Omni bounce diffuser at 21/11/2007 - 11:33
As you've probably realised I have'nt had much experience in using flash.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Pentax *istDS flash with Takumar lens ? at 21/11/2007 - 11:16
Whichever, does it void the warranty?
Comment by Mannesty posted on K10D focus at 21/11/2007 - 21:22
Hi Matt
Just completed the tests as suggested in Tim Jackson's document, looks like I may have some front focus issues with the FA50 f1.4 @ f1.4 and maybe f2 also.
I would appreciate your comments/thoughts, I've uploaded the test shots here....http://www.pbase.com/mcbrian/lens_tests&page=1
I think you need to set up your test chart more accurately. In all cases, your chart appears to be turned in a clockwise direction from the vertical. The centre 'focussing' line must be exactly horizontal for these tests to produce any really meaningful results.
Regards,
Comment by Mannesty posted on K10D focus at 21/11/2007 - 08:58
I thought the 35 on the list was a Macro? Though I admit I havn't seen a roadmap in a while
Comment by Mannesty posted on The Mythical 35/1.4 at 19/11/2007 - 20:37
Comment by Mannesty posted on AF 360 FGZ - should I get one? at 12/11/2007 - 12:19
Alternatively, I like Adobe's Lightroom.
Comment by Mannesty posted on Alternatives to samsungs digimax raw converter? at 09/11/2007 - 20:17


ND Grads (one or more) can help solve the problem if, and only if, the brighter part of the image composition is to one or more edge(s) (top, bottom, right, left). The bright portion of your images is not at one or more edges.
These particular images have a very high dynamic range, and as such would benefit from processing using an HDR dedicated piece of software like Artizen.
Phase One's Capture One V4 (beta) has some HDR capabilities too, as does Sylkipix I believe.
Artizen, for instance requires at least 2 images, one exposed for the highlights, and one exposed for the shadows. It then 'blends' them and requires some use of tone mapping to achieve an acceptible result.
The image on the home page of the above link demonstrates exactly, why you might need to use it (bright outside tunnel, dark inside).
You can also achieve something similar by combining 2 images within Photoshop etc.
The truth is, CCD and CMOS sensors have some way to go before thay can faithfully capture the extreme's of dynamic range that we often encounter.
Hope that helps.