Mannesty

Joined: 17th February 2005

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Mannesty
Mongoose wrote:
it's still showing nothing for me, how odd
All of the seller's auctions have finished which is why you see none.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Fancy some fast glass? at 23/11/2009 - 17:00

Mannesty
quocdan76 wrote:
Your lens made in Japan?
I think all of the SMCP-FA Limited lenses were made in Japan.

Comment by Mannesty posted on 43mm Limited for sale! at 23/11/2009 - 16:50

Mannesty
mxds wrote:
Sorry to get you started Mike should have checked it was available for us, will have to have another think, the 180 may be a tad to long thanks anyway,
It has been said that the SMC Pentax 200mm Macro is arguably the best macro lens ever produced by any company.

The Sigma 180mm 1:3.5 EX DG Macro lens is about the closest you'll find. Grab one while you can. If Sigma ever do make the 150mm available in K mount they might just stop producing the 180mm. It really is a very good lens.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Sigma 150mm ex dg at 22/11/2009 - 22:37

Mannesty
Congratulations to Chris and the team. Good move.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Some news from Watford! at 22/11/2009 - 22:28

Mannesty
As long as the spot is removable and not physical damage, Eclipse 2 fluid and Pecpads should do it.

Pentax sell their own wet cleaning kit too.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Censor cleaning at 22/11/2009 - 22:18

Mannesty
If you hadn't told us, I could not tell it was HDR'd. Good job I reckon.

Yes I can see the woman. Looks like she's just kicked something.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Another go at HDR at 22/11/2009 - 12:22

Mannesty
Mike-P wrote:
George Lazarette wrote:

Here's a man setting up a rationale for upgrading his camera.

G

ETA: Great minds and all that, Peter.
Am I that transparent
Yes.

Comment by Mannesty posted on DA* 55mm f1.4? at 21/11/2009 - 17:21

Mannesty
This is what I've been thinking about as well. The DA* 55mm apparently has a similar design heritage to the almost legendary FA* 85mm.

I can only recommend you do it, if only to give you another reason (read excuse) to upgrade to the K-7.

Comment by Mannesty posted on DA* 55mm f1.4? at 21/11/2009 - 16:27

Mannesty
If the main light source was a 'low energy' bulb you have the same issues as when shooting using fluorescent strip lights. The light output is changing 50 times a second (60 in US), therefore the colour temperature (WB) is also changing 50 times a second.

When you press the button half way, the (Auto) WB is set. Some time later when you make the exposure the chances are that the light colour (WB) has changed.

If you have WB set to something specific like 'Tungsten', you'll experience the same problem. Only when the lght is full on will the WB be correct'ish in camera.

Tungsten filament lamps have a more constant light output because a hot wire can't cool down and heat up that fast. Hot gas, as in a fluorescent bulb/tube, can and does.

That said, I believe that there are some 'low energy' bulbs that have a more constant output.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Can anyone explain this? at 21/11/2009 - 10:30

Mannesty
OK. I see it now. You've removed the reflection of the bollard from the models head area.

I cheated and looked at your Flickr site. There's a bit of a clue in the title.

Good job, well done.

Comment by Mannesty posted on Where's Wally? at 20/11/2009 - 09:00

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo