All Forum Comments
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Just A Load Of Bull at 24/11/2024 - 23:14
1.

2.

3.

4.

Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Just A Load Of Bull at 23/11/2024 - 19:49
In addition to the Concorde G-BBDG they also have the large model Concorde that used to sit at the little roundabout at Heathrow leading to the tunnel for T-1/2/3
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Concorde night shoot at 18/11/2024 - 16:52
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Concorde night shoot at 18/11/2024 - 15:34
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Question for K-3 III owners at 15/11/2024 - 16:40
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Question for K-3 III owners at 15/11/2024 - 12:13
It has been over a year since I switched from Pentax to a mirrorless system so I thought you might like me to share my thoughts..
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on This might be of interest, unfortunately. at 15/11/2024 - 10:02
I am just looking at the K-3 III Monochrome and am surprised to find that K and M series lenses work normally and stop down normally without using a green button technique. Amazing, so my question is does the K-3 III standard model do the same thing?

Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on Question for K-3 III owners at 14/11/2024 - 18:04
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on First *ist DS series: White, Blue, Red, Pastel Sepia at 13/11/2024 - 21:42
What do each of us want from a photographic device? I want the ability to create a work of art from the fusion of an antique lens and the controlling possibilities of a 21stC camera. They seem to want a whizz-bang box of gimmicks to render their endless selfies sufficiently well to post on social media sites, accepting the fact that their efforts will be forgotten before the week is out. There is but one of me vs. thousands of them, so which way do you expect the camera manufacturer to go?
For a lot of people (and not just young people), a photo is and always has been simply a means to a social end, be that getting 'likes' on social media, something to bring back memories, show other people where you have been etc. etc. There have always been many more of these people than those of us who might post on a photographic forum such as this and presumably see a photo as the end product. In days of old (i.e. before social media), millions of snapshots were taken on film that had no significance other that to bring back memories etc. I just have to think of the boxes of photos I've had to sort through when various relatives died. They were taken with cheap descendants of the Box Brownie. Today, a phone is used to take those sort of photos, it's a lot cheaper and easier so a lot more photos are taken and many of them are put on social media. The far fewer number of people who see the photo as the end product use, and have always used, 'fancy' cameras. The difference between now and then is that while snapshot cameras and fancy cameras used to be made by the same companies, phones and fancy cameras are made by different companies. And that is a problem for camera companies because they can no longer make their profits from the vast number of snapshot takers.
Oops, that was a longer answer than originally intended. Must go. I've got to get ready for a family gathering at a nice pub - where I will not be photographing the meal, taking snapshots of relatives eating and posting it on social media!
Steve
Comment by Lubbyman posted on This might be of interest, unfortunately. at 10/11/2024 - 10:26


Birmingham.
He's got nae knackers or a tinkle!!
And for all you other nice people who commented, thank you, it's appreciated .
Steve