PLUS

Lubbyman

Joined: 28th March 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Lubbyman
Looking through files from years ago for the weekly competitions has made me remember photos that I nearly got but didn't. In most cases it was due do error, incompetence or just being too slow. Some cases, however, were due to not having the right equipment. My most memorable example of the latter was when setting up the K20D (my only DSLR at the time) with 16-45mm lens (it came with the camera) on a tripod half way up a hillside to take a stunning landscape at dusk. Then I noticed a short eared owl flying towards me at my level, head down and hunting. It hadn't seen me. So get the camera off the tripod and a quick change of lens to the 55-300mm. But the owl was quicker, it saw me and all I got was a shot of its rear as it flew away. That was annoying. It was also expensive as it was one reason why I decided to spend hard earned cash on a second body (K3) to be able to have two cameras with me, one with long lens attached, one with shorter lens, 'just in case'.

Do any of you have memories of photos that got away? And were they as expensive as mine??

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on The One That Got Away? at 08/03/2025 - 16:28

Lubbyman
Stupendous!

Spad wrote:
This is the same deep sky object that I shot with my K3
Link, please, so we can compare.

Is it the cooling that makes the astro camera so special? Or something in the electronics? Or is it an iconograph imported from Ankh-Morpork?

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Another version... at 04/03/2025 - 10:30

Lubbyman
Will we ever see a fish in it??

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Shropshire Brook March at 02/03/2025 - 11:14

Lubbyman
Speaking personally, I like the fact that there isn't a traffic jam of planets in the photos. If there were, I'd be looking at them and ignoring the rest of the picture. As they aren't there, I've been looking at and thoroughly enjoying two absolutely glorious photos. Superb. Keep 'em coming!

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Planet No-Show. at 01/03/2025 - 16:18

Lubbyman
RAJHANS wrote:
Just my humble opinion- the Forum is a means to enrich members photographic skills through constructive critiques/ healthy discussions on the photos displayed either in a competition or otherwise. One may like or dislike a photo but he should try to reason it out- a novice may say it in simple terms, an expert in technical terms. But this should be done and taken in right spirit on both the sides.
Sums up my own view perfectly.

I've found that an unexpected benefit of entering the weekly competitions is that I'm now looking through photos from years ago that I had forgotten about. Often a pleasure, sometimes a sobering reminder that perhaps my photography hasn't improved over the years. But always interesting.

As for commenting on each entry, there is absolutely no need to do that if you don't want to. It's perfectly OK just to pick a winner and helpful to add a comment about why the winner has won. A 2nd and 3rd place is usually appreciated too. However, after that it's up to you. As far as I'm concerned, if you're happy to do it, fine. If you don't want to do it, then that's fine too.

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Reasons for few entries at 24/02/2025 - 15:51

Lubbyman
lesjacksons wrote:
Keeping fit and healthy has some great side benefits!
Or alternatively, photography can have some great side benefits .

Lovely photos. 3 completely different approaches to mist. And none with the latest, greatest, multi-gizmo, AI-packed camera and lens. As always, it's the grey matter a few cm behind the viewfinder that really matters.

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on This morning's walk at 23/02/2025 - 16:22

Lubbyman
Mr davidwozhere, you are a wicked, wicked man! Thanks to your monthly comp, what was meant to be a quick trip to the local supermarket this evening via boring and well-trodden footpaths ended up taking absolutely ages. I now know every inch of those paths in greater detail than ever thought possible. And did it produce an entry for the comp? Not a chance... .

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Monthly contest #152 - pavements at 21/02/2025 - 22:55

Lubbyman
It takes time to do a systematic survey, process the data, assess the results, evaluate the options... taking the photograph is the quick and easy bit .

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on Monthly contest #152 - pavements at 21/02/2025 - 09:29

Lubbyman
Is it wrong for a person to look at the photos on Pentax User and other photographic websites, work out what the characteristics of a decent photo are, go and take some photos of their own and sell the results? Your copyright photos have been used by someone else without explicit permission as a means of making money. Not a million miles from the AI copyright issue...

As for AI putting people out of work, there were about 1.5 million domestic servants in the UK at the start of the 20th century (some being my relatives). All but a handful were soon replaced by domestic electrical equipment. You don't see millions of unemployed servants hanging around nowadays, though. Humans are pretty good at finding things to do.

Keep calm and carry on .

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on AI and Copyright at 19/02/2025 - 08:36

Lubbyman
loadoftripe wrote:
scraping, - what a load of tosh, lawyer speak?
In this case, the lawyers are innocent. It's IT speak, not lawyer speak - the sort of thing that price comparison websites do to bring you the latest camera prices across the internet.

Steve

Comment by Lubbyman posted on AI and Copyright at 18/02/2025 - 19:17

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo