lonegroover

Joined: 8th November 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

lonegroover
Took this at a St George's Day celebration on the village green at the front of my house, earlier this afternoon.

Comment Image



.. for context, what I was photographing above can be seen in this shot. Here, Saxon rebels turn up to help defend our settlement against Norman infantry.

Comment Image

Comment by lonegroover posted on Flying The Flag at 25/04/2010 - 15:10

lonegroover
K10D wrote:
I see they are for the speckysixeyes body.

Regards
Yes, with the nose mount. It's a great shame they don't make an autofocus version.

Comment by lonegroover posted on Picked up six brand new Pentax lenses today, here's a pic at 21/04/2010 - 22:07

lonegroover
Comment Image

Comment by lonegroover posted on Picked up six brand new Pentax lenses today, here's a pic at 21/04/2010 - 20:38

lonegroover
polchraine wrote:
The Image number IMGP0753 &c is controlled by the camera and even if an old card had been used the camera would create a new directory and start numbering from the last the camera new of. That tells me that the camera had been used for 750 images before he received it.
I concur.

Comment by lonegroover posted on Oh no. New cam. First DSLR. Probs. Second hand cam ? at 11/04/2010 - 23:04

lonegroover
Hi,

This is a shot I took of a derelict petrol station while out cycling in Leicestershire this afternoon, using my K100D Super fitted with an old manual focus Pentax-A 28mm lens.

It's decidedly over-exposed, isn't it?

Comment Image


Are older lenses prone to exposure problems with a digital SLR, or was there something I could have done to avoid this? I have used the same lens / camera combination a few times, and haven't seen the same problem. Generally even much less expensive digital compacts I've used manage to get the exposure right.

Comment by lonegroover posted on Over-exposure on AUTO PICT mode at 11/04/2010 - 22:55

lonegroover
No problems at all with the negative comments, but the more I revisit it, the more I disagree - or at least differ with respect to my own taste. Going to upload this to hang on the wall in my Second Life residence, to see what it looks like in a frame.

Comment by lonegroover posted on Ripped Packet Closeup at 02/03/2010 - 23:04

lonegroover
I think that's what I like about it .. strong sunlight hitting the white paper makes the rip and the shadow a bit more dramatic.

Comment by lonegroover posted on Ripped Packet Closeup at 02/03/2010 - 20:01

lonegroover
I took this pic purely so I could solicit opinion on whether the contents of the packet shown were likely to be counterfeit on another forum. But having visited again this evening, I find something very striking and pleasing about it.. or perhaps it really is just an indifferent snap of a torn earphone packet, and I'm going mad.

Comment Image

Comment by lonegroover posted on Ripped Packet Closeup at 02/03/2010 - 19:34

lonegroover
This more or less sums up my feelings on the matter. I first saw this about 7 years ago, but sadly it's more relevant than ever.

I won't image tag it, since it contains naughty words. Adult content; discretion advised.

http://groover.kicks-ass.net/images/iproduct-feel-special.jpg

Comment by lonegroover posted on iPad or iPad Which One? at 07/02/2010 - 13:47

lonegroover
thoughton wrote:
That looks a lot like two Apple LCD screens on either side of the iMac in the middle. They look much too thin to be iMacs. I see 3 iMacs, 2 G5 towers, and 2 LCD screens.
No, no independent LCD screens. I think what you may be looking at are two back panels from the iMacs. There's a side panel from a G5 there, as well. I removed the hard drives and memory, and didn't bother reassembling.

Comment by lonegroover posted on iPad or iPad Which One? at 04/02/2010 - 12:40

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo