All Forum Comments
Good timing for the photographer, not for the Gopher!
link
and... insects covered in dew?
link
Regards
link
and... insects covered in dew?
link
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on Unlucky Gopher at 27/03/2010 - 09:16
No 1 for me. Bee appears to be heading to the flower. Great capture.
Regards
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on Bee Chasing. Spring has finally sprung. at 22/03/2010 - 03:58
Welcome to life outside of the UK. Hope yo get everything sorted.
By that, I don't mean that life in the UK is better.
Regards
By that, I don't mean that life in the UK is better.
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on Still in thailand! at 20/03/2010 - 17:34
Comment by K10D posted on The Sigma 150-500 at 19/03/2010 - 17:37
Mike-P wrote:
If I remember correctly forum member K10D has the same 70-200mm and has nothing but good things to say about it as well.
The lens is exceptional. Never had an issue and it has been on my istD, K10D and even my MZS. The 1.4 EX TC works faultlessly with it.nicolas1970i wrote:
Same pre-DG non-HSM version sold for £260 a few days ago, because it had front/back focus issues (seller was very honest about it).
Apparently it's a possible problem with Sigma pre-DG version - so the seller was told by Sigma.
I have the same problem with my 100-300 f4, massive back-focus at 100mm, and front-focus at 300mm, which isn't even compensated by -10 on the focus adjust (and then it'd be even more off at 100mm!). It's going straight to Sigma service dept. - and it's going to cost me 150-200€.
The price looks good, but it's a lottery as far as I'm concerned...
Interesting, I have never heard of a bad one .. I bought mine because it was so well thought of on Pentaxforums and its superb. My 100-300mm f4 is also spot on.Same pre-DG non-HSM version sold for £260 a few days ago, because it had front/back focus issues (seller was very honest about it).
Apparently it's a possible problem with Sigma pre-DG version - so the seller was told by Sigma.
I have the same problem with my 100-300 f4, massive back-focus at 100mm, and front-focus at 300mm, which isn't even compensated by -10 on the focus adjust (and then it'd be even more off at 100mm!). It's going straight to Sigma service dept. - and it's going to cost me 150-200€.
The price looks good, but it's a lottery as far as I'm concerned...
If I remember correctly forum member K10D has the same 70-200mm and has nothing but good things to say about it as well.
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on Sigma APO EX 70-200mm f2.8 at 19/03/2010 - 07:43
So I should be using a PC for photoshop and not my Nokia?
Thought it was slow....
Regards
Thought it was slow....
Regards
Comment by K10D posted on new computer for photoshop at 18/03/2010 - 11:51
cardiff_gareth wrote:
So you have from now til Saturday to de-dust your camera and lens then
Camera was wiped clean with a wet cloth to remove the fine dust that would not blow off. Weather is now very clear and warming up, 37'C yesterday.So you have from now til Saturday to de-dust your camera and lens then
That said, my istD went through all of this type of weather and is still going strong.
impotentspider wrote:
Nah, unfortunately. I do it for the love of photography......Quote:
I have another Golf shoot this coming Saturday and there's too many of my avatars on the screen
WOW, you shoot for Volkswagen, thats amazingI have another Golf shoot this coming Saturday and there's too many of my avatars on the screen
Regards
Andrew, Andrew, you have an eye for a shot, and the ability to produce the shot.
A talent sought by many, yet mastered by few.
Best regards, excellent work.
A talent sought by many, yet mastered by few.
Best regards, excellent work.
Comment by K10D posted on Left Luggage: Portmanteaux at 16/03/2010 - 20:38
Spooky.
Regards