All Forum Comments
Comment by K10D posted on Gardner Douglas Mk4 at 30/12/2012 - 11:44
Comment by K10D posted on Another pointless thread at 29/12/2012 - 00:11
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Pentax LX shutter problem and also batteries at 29/12/2012 - 00:06
The AG13 is an alkaline button cell under the general LR44 group of batteries. An SR44battery is Silver Oxide and has a slightly higher capacity as well as voltage-link
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Pentax LX shutter problem and also batteries at 28/12/2012 - 23:53
Doesn't the LX measure the light actually reaching the film?
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on ME Super blank negatives at 28/12/2012 - 04:52
Comment by K10D posted on When APS-C just aint big enough at 28/12/2012 - 02:20
I like the squatter removal techniques in the first eight images. Obviously HRH was also happy at the final outcome.
That last image of the police officer watching the performer conjures up all sorts of comments.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on I went to see the Queen at 27/12/2012 - 23:27
Comment by K10D posted on Aug 25th 2006 at 27/12/2012 - 10:19
As JR pointed out, this is one of those threads that will always have two sides to it. The other common divide is the JPG/RAW theme.
I do take your point of cost of one against the other. Opinions are what it's all about at the end of the day.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on To filter or not to filter... at 27/12/2012 - 09:10
I doubt a Pentax service centre in the UK would provide a front replacement lens element for say the 50-135mm for the equivalent of $79 and would that include labour? Then there’s the waiting time involved for the repair and we are talking Pentax not Canon or Nikon.
I used to have filters on all my lenses, but stopped after reading similar threads in the past.
So you made a choice not to use filters and that is your prerogative.
You’re saying that you stopped using filters after reading threads rather than any actual incident with your kit or that you noticed any drop in IQ of your images.
Quoting you "then IMO buying a filter for that reason is not a good investment" yet "I used to have filters on all my lenses". In your case yes, a bad investment if indeed you consider buying any camera gear an investment as it generally always falls in value.
My first 16-50mm SDM was damaged after front end impact into a concrete step. The filter was fine as it was the lens hood that took the impact but the lens was a banana shaped and was not repairable. So if a lens hood protects the front element, as inferred by cabstar, surely it would protect the filter? It did on my 16-50mm SDM.
I also have lenses that can't take filters and am always more aware of the vulnerability of the front element in certain shooting situations. So I have a foot in both camps, filtered and unfiltered.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on To filter or not to filter... at 27/12/2012 - 05:52



This is the chassis that has passed the Australian Design Rules Test as shown scrolled across the website link.
Still plenty to do prior to registration but its been an interesting project. It is the only one in Australia.
Best regards