All Forum Comments
Just got back from visiting the museum to see the Mallards. link A great presentation. Many hundreds of visitors there as you would expect. Never seen so many cameras inside one building at the same time.
Comment by K10D posted on York Railway Museum-Mallard 75 at 03/07/2013 - 15:55
johnriley wrote:
Nikon lens compatibility is off topic for Pentax User, so please keep within our brief.
Many thanks.
Obviously not for some posts John. You did not raise the issue with Johna. Nikon lens compatibility is off topic for Pentax User, so please keep within our brief.
Many thanks.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Pentax Ricoh at 03/07/2013 - 15:46
johnha wrote:
Look at CaNikons fragmented lens compatibility charts for an example!
John.
It makes you wonder why the top pro's would even consider using such systems.Look at CaNikons fragmented lens compatibility charts for an example!
John.
Could you provide the links to the charts. The only Nikon one I tend to use is here link The first paragraph sums it up quite well for their case.
I never heard anyone call the F mount crippled.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Pentax Ricoh at 03/07/2013 - 06:18
Those in the know have kept their K10D's or have acquired one. All brands of digital camera are effectively electronically tweaked types of film. Even the Pentax models differ. Both my istD and K10 have a look that is better than my K7. Forget pixel peeping and sharpness/detail fluff, there is a lot more going on.
Just as some had a preference for a specific film, I find its the same for me with a digital body. My film bodies are never "confined" to a look.
I am sure that people are starting to realise that some bodies stand out and there are plenty of examples outside of the Pentax marque that show this.
Best regards
Just as some had a preference for a specific film, I find its the same for me with a digital body. My film bodies are never "confined" to a look.
I am sure that people are starting to realise that some bodies stand out and there are plenty of examples outside of the Pentax marque that show this.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on K10D decision at 02/07/2013 - 08:42
It does of course make a lot of sense: PRIC becomes RIC.
The Pentax name will still be on the products.
Best regards
The Pentax name will still be on the products.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Pentax Ricoh at 02/07/2013 - 07:57
Pentax? Didn't they used to make cameras?
Ricoh, "A New World Order" company......
Ricoh, "A New World Order" company......
Comment by K10D posted on Pentax Ricoh at 02/07/2013 - 06:32
K5+FA100mm macro
Best regards
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Morning visitor at 01/07/2013 - 05:55
Some one other than a Canon user might see this a fighting talk. link
The original link came up on Rice's blog. This guy knows how to get a smile out of people.
Best regards
The original link came up on Rice's blog. This guy knows how to get a smile out of people.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Should we take offense at 30/06/2013 - 11:07
Once again Nigel, great work and worthwhile effort.
Meticulous is a word that springs to mind.
Based on your findings, I am still in no mind to go out and get another version of my K5. For the jobs I use it for, it does the needful.
Best regards
Meticulous is a word that springs to mind.
Based on your findings, I am still in no mind to go out and get another version of my K5. For the jobs I use it for, it does the needful.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on K5II choice considerations - a new take at 28/06/2013 - 00:07
martoto wrote:
The difference between K30 and K50 is so marginal and both are very good. I'd take the cheaper between these two.
Sounds like the K5 II and IIs issue?The difference between K30 and K50 is so marginal and both are very good. I'd take the cheaper between these two.
The K30 at the lower price would make sense. Only glass holds value of any worth.
Bodies are effectively disposable.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on K30 or K50? at 27/06/2013 - 23:45
