All Forum Comments
Comment by K10D posted on New lenses How Exciting!!! at 16/09/2014 - 23:21
George Lazarette wrote:
I don't know why the perpetual whingers (Yves and Cabstar being examples) continue to post here.
Welcome back George. I don't know why the perpetual whingers (Yves and Cabstar being examples) continue to post here.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Pentax, or ?? at 16/09/2014 - 07:56
I'll do a conversion Andrew.
Best regards
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on see through at 15/09/2014 - 02:13
Great work and worth the effort.
Best regards
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Saturday Rugby and Hockey Action at 15/09/2014 - 02:12
Horst wrote:
Maybe from now on we'll have streamlined lens hoods.
Regards, Horst
The simpler eason was to avoid the hood/flash cut off shadow on the airborn aircraft or indeed the pilots face.Quote:
3) This one is purely technical and involves aerodynamics. Should a slight breeze be present, one risks the possibility of additional turbulence caused by the partial cavitation - negative pressure disturbance anomaly. This of course induces irregular vibration into the optics resulting in an blurred image.
You made a good case here.3) This one is purely technical and involves aerodynamics. Should a slight breeze be present, one risks the possibility of additional turbulence caused by the partial cavitation - negative pressure disturbance anomaly. This of course induces irregular vibration into the optics resulting in an blurred image.
Maybe from now on we'll have streamlined lens hoods.
Regards, Horst
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Tell me why? at 15/09/2014 - 02:11
Sounds like you had an interesting day Kris.
Possible explanations:
1) Was the camera tripod mounted? If so maybe HDR? Otherwise the user was probably compensating for not having a license to use an MP5.
2) This is simple Kris, the flash attracts the attention of the pilot who then ends up looking straight at the camera and hey presto, you have "that shot".
3) This one is purely technical and involves aerodynamics. Should a slight breeze be present, one risks the possibility of additional turbulence caused by the partial cavitation - negative pressure disturbance anomaly. This of course induces irregular vibration into the optics resulting in an blurred image.
Hope this explains it in layman's terms.
Best regards
Possible explanations:
1) Was the camera tripod mounted? If so maybe HDR? Otherwise the user was probably compensating for not having a license to use an MP5.
2) This is simple Kris, the flash attracts the attention of the pilot who then ends up looking straight at the camera and hey presto, you have "that shot".
3) This one is purely technical and involves aerodynamics. Should a slight breeze be present, one risks the possibility of additional turbulence caused by the partial cavitation - negative pressure disturbance anomaly. This of course induces irregular vibration into the optics resulting in an blurred image.
Hope this explains it in layman's terms.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Tell me why? at 14/09/2014 - 00:14
K5 + 50-135mm
Best regards
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on see through at 13/09/2014 - 13:28
Exciting stuff......