PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Shaky wrote:
Don wrote:
I think the important thing here is that Pentax performed so well against a much bigger consumer electronics giant like sony... says a lot about what they are capable of doing...
I don’t wish to flog a dead horse here, but the issue clearly is that Sony’s last generation A55 & A33 SLT cameras are not being counted as dslrs - and rightly so!
Well this reviewer thinks they are clearly DSLRs, as explained previously. The EVF instead of an optical pentaprism is neither here nor there. Was a Canon Pellix not an SLR? Is an Asahiflex not an SLR? Of course they are.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax a respectable 3rd at 29/01/2012 - 08:25

johnriley
Even Ansel Adams shot thousands of colour images and I seem to recall there is a book, possibly called "Ansel Adams in Colour" that offers a selection of these.

If anybody doesn't know who Ansel Adams was, then it's worth getting a book of his images, printed as large as possible so at least we get some idea of what the quality might be like in the real thing. The best books, from his official publisher, are printed in duotone to very high standards.

Comment by johnriley posted on The stupidest thing I've seen today. at 29/01/2012 - 08:20

johnriley
There are lots of Pentax pro photographers, but in the end it doesn't matter what camera they used at any particular time. Whatever it was, they knew what they were doing and they were great photographers.

Comment by johnriley posted on Name a Pentax Using Pro past or present. at 29/01/2012 - 00:28

johnriley
The 50mm f1.4 must rank as one of the longest lasting discontinued items...and still no trouble selling them it seems.

Comment by johnriley posted on jessops lens offers at 28/01/2012 - 19:41

johnriley
Quote:
What was special about the Coolscan Kodachrome setting. Surely it isn't something that couldn't be achieved in basic PP software such as Elements?
It's to do with the initial scan, which is something that's far too late at the Photoshop stage. Try scanning black and white film on a colour negative setting and see what happens!

Comment by johnriley posted on Viewing 35mm Slides at 28/01/2012 - 18:05

johnriley
You can probably get good advice from those shops at some WWT sites - there's a helpful guy at Martin Mere, for example.

For adapters, look to SRB Griturn, who can adapt almost anything to almost anything else. Sometimes, but not always, at a price of course!

Comment by johnriley posted on Digiscoping at 28/01/2012 - 18:03

johnriley
Quote:
how do you spot a Kodachrome slide when it has been glass mounted, other than guessing
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No need to guess, Kodachrome can't be mistaken!

Comment by johnriley posted on Viewing 35mm Slides at 28/01/2012 - 17:59

johnriley
Bear in mind that Kodachrome doesn't scan as well as Ektachrome, because of its different structure. The Nikon Coolscan has a special Kodachrome setting for this reason.

Comment by johnriley posted on Viewing 35mm Slides at 28/01/2012 - 17:10

johnriley
There were learned articles published in fine publications in the 1950s with titles like "Do we need colour?" and of course some masters of monochrome were reluctant to accept any new medium that they were not masters of.

Seeing in colour is, IMHO, quite different from seeing in black and white, it's a different selectivity when assessing a scene. That's why taking two cameras, one colour film and one BW film, never worked for me. I had to attune to one or the other for the duration of whatever the project was.

Both colour and monochrome photography have their own places and are equally valid, although I am surprised to find that in the case of these images in the original post, I actually prefer the colour versions.

Comment by johnriley posted on The stupidest thing I've seen today. at 28/01/2012 - 14:43

johnriley
It's a workshop job, not a user adjustment.

If you find it's important, then it should be returned under warranty. I haven't turned that feature on yet, so I have no idea whether or not our own levels are accurate. I'd rather trust my eye.

Comment by johnriley posted on K5 - Electronic Level Adjustment?? at 28/01/2012 - 14:19

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo