PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Let's not confuse design and aesthetics. The design of Pentax cameras has always been excellent and still is. Here I mean quality of construction, ergonomics and quality of results.

Aesthetics is the appearance of a product, and that's in the eye of the beholder.

Features of course describe the functions of an item, and both the K-01 and the K-5 share many features. What really counts are the benefits of those features, and sadly many sales people still cannot differentiate between these two things. It doesn't mean they don't exist though.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax K-01 at 03/02/2012 - 22:18

johnriley

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax K-01 at 03/02/2012 - 20:41

johnriley
Quote:
Can we post about Optios in this part of the forum too?
There is a section provided for Optio discussion.

Comment by johnriley posted on New forum section at 03/02/2012 - 18:25

johnriley
-4.5C here this morning, very cold for us softies.

Tomorrow is a wedding shoot up near the hills, so we'll see what the weather brings. Last year we did a wedding at Harome near Pickering in Yorkshire and it was deep snow. That was a serious trauma to get to and from, so we're hoping for better weather for this one!

Comment by johnriley posted on Another pointless thread at 03/02/2012 - 11:02

johnriley
The ME Super wins hands down in terms of usability and ergonomics and there is nothing in it optically once the best lenses are used.

The Leica is, IMHO, superbly made using traditional techniques, very expensive and horrible to use. Give me an SLR design every time. Clearly there is no size or weight advantage to the rangefinder either.

Comment by johnriley posted on MX & ME base plates compared .... at 03/02/2012 - 11:00

johnriley
junousia wrote:
John might be right about new customers, but what about we old customers, our current DSLRs dosen't last for ever?
Existing users can happily continue to use their K mount lenses, either on a Mirrorless Pentax or on a DSLR, as they prefer. That's more choice, not less?

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax K-01 at 03/02/2012 - 10:56

johnriley
Shaky mentioned OLED screens, and they are really excellent for sure.

One of the things that we tend to overlook, probably understandably, is that a whole new generation of photographers have a totally different perspective. They are the iPhone generation, if you like, and I have to sdmit to being a huge fan of the way my iPhone has opened up communications.

Traditional concepts are being challenged daily and we are on a new path. One thing remains sure though and that is that the new K-01 is going to produce splendid images, in the right hands. It may well also appeal to a whole new generation of pentax Users, and without courting them now Pentax would only last as long as we do.

I say go for it Pentax. The more I think about it, the more this K-01 appeals to me and I think of new ways it can be used.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax K-01 at 03/02/2012 - 09:59

johnriley
geordie01 wrote:
The camera in my phone just about does what the ko1 does why would i want to lug this around as well.
Because the camera in your phone doesn't produce professional quality images that could be used in the most prestigious magazines and books, or enlarged to make stunning exhibition prints.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax K-01 at 03/02/2012 - 08:26

johnriley
The lens was designed for film, is quite bulky and heavy and unlikely to be at its best on digital.

Comment by johnriley posted on tokina af 19-35 at 03/02/2012 - 08:23

johnriley
I've noticed a couple of comments about the sensor, bu Pentax did say that it was a new sensor.

Comment by johnriley posted on Will K5 price be driven down by new mirrorless? at 03/02/2012 - 08:21

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo