PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Interesting Bernard, I avoided varifocals as I thought they might be a problem with the SLR viewfinders as well.

When doing table-top stuff I actually wear the glasses I use for the PC and that works well. The K20D has the dioptre setting adjusted to suit that.

Comment by johnriley posted on compact with a decent viewfinder at 14/03/2012 - 16:52

johnriley
Well, no need to check for defects as there are not very likely to be any, just set it up as you wish and go out and enjoy it.

Then let's see some of your results!

Comment by johnriley posted on How to check K-5 for usual defects? at 14/03/2012 - 16:42

johnriley
I'm not so sure that the Box Brownie is a good example of a useful viewfinder, the frame finders are probably easier to use.

I'm short sighted and it makes using the back screen incredibly easy, without need for any glasses at all.

Viewfinders on compact cameras are not usually much good, with some classic examples such as the Voigtlanders of the 1950s and 1960s, which were superb.

The forum rules are something else though, and this keeps us Pentax and Pentax-related. When we don't we stray very quickly and it usually comes to grief, so we keep that reasonably tight.

Comment by johnriley posted on compact with a decent viewfinder at 14/03/2012 - 16:06

johnriley
Using sRGB throughout the workflow makes life much easier and there are no colour mismatches on the web either.

Comment by johnriley posted on Eat My Greens! - Colour calibration Jpg/ Raw/ Tif at 14/03/2012 - 16:01

johnriley
Hope you like your new purchase es and we'll be interested to hear how you are getting on with it.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax K-01 at 14/03/2012 - 14:57

johnriley
This is going way off-topic now, as we know other marques are considered off limits....

Comment by johnriley posted on compact with a decent viewfinder at 14/03/2012 - 14:55

johnriley
I suppose if a camera was to be used for, say, taking a shot every five seconds continuously, then the shutter would soon reach a very high count. This would probably be a case of "unreasonable use" that was way outside the normal design expectations.

As it is, we do take far more images than we ever did with film, so we hammer our shutters much more. By and large even with this high use level they do seem quite reliable.

Comment by johnriley posted on 100,000 isn't a very big number at 14/03/2012 - 13:24

johnriley
To be fair, this is a photography forum and even though there are self-employed people on it their particular circumstances can be quite unlike your son's.

He really should get proper advice and also go on the HMRC course for newly or possible self-employed people.

Comment by johnriley posted on Small business accounting software (off topic) at 14/03/2012 - 11:13

johnriley
Which is why we don't do politics on Pentax User, please try to avoid slipping into the subject, it just causes arguments and offence.

Comment by johnriley posted on Another pointless thread at 14/03/2012 - 10:22

johnriley
Viewfinders on truly compact cameras appear to be a thing of the past.

Comment by johnriley posted on compact with a decent viewfinder at 13/03/2012 - 14:12

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo