All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax FF: Less MP more Image Quality ? at 08/04/2014 - 00:12
So I tend to agree with Peter.
It is possible of course that, dissatisfied with progress, we could put the blame on not having the right equipment, instead of tackling the core problem.
I am not referring here to anyone you guys would know by the way, so no-one need feel offended!
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax FF: Less MP more Image Quality ? at 07/04/2014 - 20:42
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax 645D now £4249 !!!!!!! at 07/04/2014 - 15:56
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax FF: Less MP more Image Quality ? at 07/04/2014 - 14:25
But yes, it's only a matter of time before 36 MP might be considered a bit passé for the modern photographer....
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax FF: Less MP more Image Quality ? at 07/04/2014 - 14:09
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax 67 II at 07/04/2014 - 13:33
Pentax look to high quality in a large market, albeit it with a modest market share, but a share that is no doubt growing.
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax FF: Less MP more Image Quality ? at 07/04/2014 - 13:32
Couple these with the K-5 IIs or the K-3 and you will have images as sharp as you can cope with.
Comment by johnriley posted on K3 Lens reommendation. at 06/04/2014 - 20:17
Comment by johnriley posted on Are there Server problems with the Pentaxuser Site?? at 06/04/2014 - 00:42


To be honest, noise is already incredibly low. Just think about how noisy (grainy) even ISO 400 film is, never mind the more esoteric ones such as the long gone Kodak Recording Film 2475 and Agfapan 1000.
However, I don't mind noise (grain) within reason, as long as it's reproduced as crisp, sharp grain. Tri-X in FX-39, yum yum!