All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on The need for a lens hood. at 05/08/2014 - 23:53
Many other designs don't seem at all prone to flare.
Comment by johnriley posted on The need for a lens hood. at 05/08/2014 - 21:25
Comment by johnriley posted on SR in Lenses at 05/08/2014 - 17:56
I wonder why?
Comment by johnriley posted on SR in Lenses at 05/08/2014 - 15:48
Comment by johnriley posted on The need for a lens hood. at 05/08/2014 - 15:37
Comment by johnriley posted on The need for a lens hood. at 05/08/2014 - 14:53
Also of course with the APS-C sensors a 1.5 times longer lens hood can be used.
Roger
Comment by johnriley posted on The need for a lens hood. at 05/08/2014 - 13:28
Comment by johnriley posted on Monthly Competition #26: The Selfie- Discussion thread. at 05/08/2014 - 08:36
Why not look out for a Pentax Rear Converter K T6-2X - I have one here that cost me about £40. No electronics, so manual focus and manual stop down metering, but better quality than most of the cheap converters.
If you keep your eyes peeled one will turn up sooner or later.
Comment by johnriley posted on Cheap multiplier at 04/08/2014 - 19:03
Comment by johnriley posted on Macro shots at 04/08/2014 - 15:39


A squared off hood (longer in one dimension than the other)is also quite efficient, following the dimensions of the film gate.
Round hoods tend to be quite long tubes, for telephoto lenses.
As for the man from National Geographic, I don't know what he was saying.