PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Why not contact Hoya, ask them to justify their claims and see what they say?

:

Comment by johnriley posted on Polarizer Filter at 10/09/2007 - 23:44

johnriley
Quote:
I said "thank you, but no, I couldn't possibly inflict such an obvious financial misfortune on such a wonderful establishment as yours". then removed the 'digital' (read plain glass) filter, slammed it onto the counter (breaking the filter), exclaimed "oh dear, the backlight switch on my camera seems to have moved", put my camera back in it's bag, and walked out.
My goodness, you arrived and left in a whirlwind of shattered glass!

That is dramatic.

Comment by johnriley posted on Polarizer Filter at 10/09/2007 - 22:23

johnriley
Quote:
I consider 'Digital' filters as simply being a marketing ploy, as I don't see how anything in front of the lens could be digital compatible or not.
I would interpret it as meaning a thin (avoiding vignetting) multicoated circular polariser of high quality. There have been improvements in polarisers in recent years and it just dates it as belonging to the digital era in terms of its design qualities.

Comment by johnriley posted on Polarizer Filter at 10/09/2007 - 19:01

johnriley
There will be different opinions on this, but there have been advances in recent years in the quality and the coatings used on polarisers.

If you want a neutral grey result, the best image quality and a circular polariser then it will not be cheap in 67mm size.

I would try one of the Jessops clearance stores to see if they have one with 70% off the price. And then go for the best. The one intended for digital cameras may well be the best choice, although not necessary as such in other ways.

Comment by johnriley posted on Polarizer Filter at 10/09/2007 - 18:06

johnriley
The Pentax 12-24mm is a lovely lens. It covers the focal length you are missing and has the advantage of being a constant aperture zoom. (The f number does not change whilst zooming)

There are plenty of dealers in the UK who have the lens, why not try SRS, Jessops, Jacobs, Park Cameras, etc., whichever one has your loyalty.

Comment by johnriley posted on Wide angle for Pentax digital: advice and availability? at 10/09/2007 - 17:38

johnriley
Owls can be very wise.

We were at an owl sanctuary near Penrith and brother-in-law Mark saw a snowy owl that was quite delightful. "It's a pity it's against that white wall," he said.

The owl looked up, trundled away from the white wall, stood in front of some foliage and posed. Amazing.

Comment by johnriley posted on K10D and FA50mm 1.4 at 11/09/2007 - 20:20

johnriley
Nothing wrong with pictures of Owls - they have wonderfully expressive faces.

Comment by johnriley posted on K10D and FA50mm 1.4 at 10/09/2007 - 08:06

johnriley
Quote:
Hope you don't have cause to regret that offer. We might get overwhelmed by shoe-fetishists.
I can always repent at leisure.

There's probably a Taschen book for people who like shoes, handbags or whatever else. In the style of "1000 Chairs", a riveting volume if you like chairs.

Comment by johnriley posted on Body or glass? Opinions please. at 10/09/2007 - 18:01

johnriley
Quote:
Can the moderator set up a whole new section. Shoes for Pentaxians?
It's got its position on the list of priorities...

Images of shoes can be posted already, should you feel so inclined.

Comment by johnriley posted on Body or glass? Opinions please. at 10/09/2007 - 15:48

johnriley
It's a plan, and a good one at that.

Comment by johnriley posted on Body or glass? Opinions please. at 07/09/2007 - 22:11

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo