All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on 30 seconds max, why? at 23/12/2008 - 16:38
Comment by johnriley posted on Can SRS Microsystems be trusted? at 23/12/2008 - 16:36
Comment by johnriley posted on Can SRS Microsystems be trusted? at 23/12/2008 - 16:35
Comment by johnriley posted on Jessops at it again!! at 23/12/2008 - 13:35
Comment by johnriley posted on lense storage at 23/12/2008 - 13:33
I'm not so sure it's a feature that many people would want. It isn't difficult to count off the seconds!
Comment by johnriley posted on 30 seconds max, why? at 22/12/2008 - 23:37
In a digital camera very long exposures also heats up the sensor.
Bit most of all as shutters have for a long time been designed with a 30 seciond limit this will have more to do with film and a thing called reciprocity failure.
That is, at very long exposures the normal relationship between shutter speed and aperture breaks down. If an exposure is correct at say 1 secod at f11 then you would expect an equivalent to be 2 seconds at f16, but you will find it needs to be morw like 4 seconds. An expected 30 secondexposure might be more like two minutes to expose film correctly.
So a timed very long exposure was worthless.
Comment by johnriley posted on 30 seconds max, why? at 22/12/2008 - 22:43
Examples include older cameras such as the Pentax MX and ME series models, which should only use silver oxide or alkaline G13 cells and not the lithium alternatives. Also included are more modern digital cameras which were not designed for lithium. Sometimes the manuals expressly state that they should not be used.
I know the temptation is often "it can't matter" but sometimes it does.
Comment by johnriley posted on Use of Lithuim AAs at 22/12/2008 - 16:31
the warmth, comfort and sucker of the Pentax bosom....
Comment by johnriley posted on Sigma 120-400 f4.5-5.6 APO DG HSM at 22/12/2008 - 10:10
Comment by johnriley posted on lense storage at 22/12/2008 - 09:44

