All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on Using 200mm lens query at 18/03/2009 - 10:51
Is this really true? I believe a 200mm lens is 200mm no matter what sensor size you have. So the 1/focal length rule should still apply.
Frankly I can't hold such a lens that steady though - it wavers all over the place - so I would go for as fast as possible, plus SR where available! Of course a sturdy tripod would be better....
Comment by johnriley posted on Using 200mm lens query at 18/03/2009 - 10:33
I would just put the items up for auction and leave it at that. They might do better than BIN. If you have fixed prices, why not list those on this forum first to see if there are any takers - the Pentax stuff anyway.....
Comment by johnriley posted on Paypal caution? at 18/03/2009 - 10:29
Comment by johnriley posted on Paypal caution? at 18/03/2009 - 08:33
Don't listen to Wikipedia, whoever wrote that entry was not venerable enough.
Apologies to those who will now rush to their dictionaries again...
Comment by johnriley posted on TITLES? at 17/03/2009 - 23:53
This has been asked for for a long time because we just had Forum Veteran at 30 posts and that was it.
The new titles were created by me and the rest of the PU team in an ecxchange of messages that ended up with what we have now.
Over at another forum, high posters can reach the dizzy heights of Photographer and finally Iconic Photographer....I'm just plain old Admin over there.
Comment by johnriley posted on TITLES? at 17/03/2009 - 21:53
The blue can is intended for paper, not for thicker material like photographs.
Comment by johnriley posted on What does eveyone do with their photos? at 17/03/2009 - 16:51
Comment by johnriley posted on Private messages on this site... at 17/03/2009 - 16:39
Comment by johnriley posted on DAL 50-200 at 17/03/2009 - 15:59


The 300mm lens does not exist! Why stop at the equivalent on a 35mm camera? It might be a 2000mm equivalent on a 10x8 camera So use 1/2000th sec. in that case
A standard lens on a Minox sub-miniature is a 15mm, but has the field of view of a standard lens, but because of the huge magnification needed is more in need of a tripod than a standard lens on your 10"x8" view camera. If you were making 10"x8" prints from both, in the case of the larger format it would be a contact print, in the case of the smaller one it would be an enormous enlargement.
Now don't get me started on depth of field again!