All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on The Oddest Camera at 31/03/2009 - 13:44
Personally I would take the 16-50mm (although in reality I would take the 16-45mm as it's much more compact) as the 24-90mm is a rather long lens for general use on digital. For me that is.
However, you know your photographic style better than we do.
Comment by johnriley posted on 24-90 or 16-50 at 31/03/2009 - 12:55
This one will be interesting to watch!
Comment by johnriley posted on The Oddest Camera at 31/03/2009 - 12:11
To be honest, the type of shutter that has been used almost always works regardless of age. And without batteries...
Comment by johnriley posted on The Oddest Camera at 31/03/2009 - 10:17
[IMG]http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff250/johnriley1uk/033-Bespoke-Camera.jpg[/IMG]
Comment by johnriley posted on The Oddest Camera at 31/03/2009 - 08:31
A home made 35mm camera.
I'll try and get an image of it later. It's based on a box, maybe a cut down box camera, with a Kodak rectilinear lens and shutter grafted on maybe from an old folder and with a hand built transaport mechanism. It has a specially made lens hood and filter holder assembly as well. Very curious.
It might appeal to someone who is really into bespoke engineering solutions!
Comment by johnriley posted on The Oddest Camera at 30/03/2009 - 15:15
Comment by johnriley posted on Lens for low light,Dark scenes at 30/03/2009 - 12:21
Comment by johnriley posted on Lens for low light,Dark scenes at 30/03/2009 - 11:53
Comment by johnriley posted on Bad spelin' at 30/03/2009 - 10:13
My usual clean would be to breath lightly on the lens, allow to evaporate and then wipe with a microfibre cloth. Not on a sensor though. Don't forget to flick off any grit first otherwise you will wipe it across the glass and scratch it.
Clean of last resort is lens cleaning fluid. Only very rarely necessary though.
Sensors are something else entirely.
Comment by johnriley posted on cleaning a uv filter at 30/03/2009 - 10:10

