All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on Leaving Pentax at 07/07/2009 - 13:48
You have not looked on ebay recently: £40 - £50 is the going rate for the Takumar these days.
Comment by johnriley posted on 135mm f1:2.5 K lens at 07/07/2009 - 12:43
SR was also tweaked between the K10D, K20D and now the K7.
Constant progress.....
Comment by johnriley posted on Comparing Cameras at 07/07/2009 - 12:41
This really had nothing to do with the problems some photographers have had.
Comment by johnriley posted on OTT Security Guards - St Helens Festival - Sherdley Park 2009 at 07/07/2009 - 11:30
Comment by johnriley posted on Board software tweak ... at 07/07/2009 - 09:35
Comment by johnriley posted on Is the 16-50 Da a dud at 07/07/2009 - 09:13
Comment by johnriley posted on 135mm f1:2.5 K lens at 07/07/2009 - 09:11
Cheers!
Comment by johnriley posted on Continuous vs Flash Lighting and Everything in Between Part 4 at 07/07/2009 - 09:04
If so, it's a "budget" 4 element design that gives a respectable performance on film. Don't know about on digital.
Worth £20 if it's in nice condition.
Comment by johnriley posted on 135mm f1:2.5 K lens at 07/07/2009 - 09:01
The first question I have is, do you think that amateurs in particular are swayed by the lens range and the existence of expensive and exotic designs?
The second question is, do they actually buy any of them, or do they just dream? After all, it's all very well knowing Canon (say) make a 400mm f2.8, but could we afford one anyway?
I can't think of anything that I would reasonably want to buy that Pentax don't provide, for my photo style anyway, although something like a 80-400mm might be nice I'm not sure I could afford it....
Comment by johnriley posted on Your Most Exotic Lens at 07/07/2009 - 00:19


Pentax has a huge back catalogue of quality lens design, so I would guess that if a FF frame camera is planned then the appropriate range of lenses would be in the wings ready.