PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Only from a vague memory. I'm not sure now if it was £4000 or £7000, but at that level it might be academic anyway?

Comment by johnriley posted on Your Most Exotic Lens at 08/07/2009 - 18:51

johnriley
Well Martin, I'd love to tell you where, but there are so many different threads on the subject I confess that I haven't found it yet!

My conclusion is that life is too short to bother as the main thing is that you won! And after telling us you didn't enter competitions....I'm very pleased you relented for this one.

Enjoy your extra year of membership!

Comment by johnriley posted on Thank you Pentax User (Magazine) at 08/07/2009 - 18:44

johnriley
Rees, if you want a 600mm f4 then you can order one! It may not be at a price that's even thinkable though....

Comment by johnriley posted on Your Most Exotic Lens at 08/07/2009 - 18:34

johnriley
There's nothing wrong with success, and nothing wrong with building success through successful partnerships.

IMHO we're far too shy about being successful in the UK.

Comment by johnriley posted on A perfect marriage...... at 08/07/2009 - 18:32

johnriley
The pentax version is SMC coated, which ensures low flare and a cos=nsistent image colour with the other Pentax lenses.

It's a good lens that delivers the quality, the downside being bulk, weight and limited aperture.

Not for architecture, but for general pictorial work the barrel distortion is always acceptable and often not really noticeable.

Comment by johnriley posted on smc-DA 18-250mm/3.5~6.3 ED AL [IF] ?? at 08/07/2009 - 17:36

johnriley
It wasn't a secret Martin - it was in the details of the 100th competition!

Well done though, a well deserved win on a quite difficult 100th competition.

It's just a shame that the other piuctures from previous competitions seem to have been squeezed out through lack of space.

Comment by johnriley posted on Thank you Pentax User (Magazine) at 08/07/2009 - 17:32

johnriley
The green tiles are superb.

Yes, it was the 12-24mm and that was only just wide enough to squeeze all this in.

Comment by johnriley posted on Victoria Baths at 08/07/2009 - 14:29

johnriley
Here's the landing outside the Superintendant's flat:
[IMG]http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff250/johnriley1uk/013-Landing-at-Victoria-Bat.jpg[/IMG]

Comment by johnriley posted on Victoria Baths at 08/07/2009 - 11:49

johnriley
I agree with you, I'm not so sure either.

I do know that I don't feel any imperative to buy the 16-50mm f2.8 as opposed to my 16-45mm f4.....apart from anything else, do I need the extra bulk and weight?

Comment by johnriley posted on Are 'fast' lenses less important with modern DSLRs? at 08/07/2009 - 11:39

johnriley
The 50-200mm is compact, light and inexpensive. It's also very good.

The 55-300mm is a bigger lens, but is slightly better i think than the 50-200mm.

One advantage of the 50-200mm is that if you are also using the 18-55mm they share the same 52mm filter thread, so the same filters and accessories can be used on both.

Comment by johnriley posted on Is the Da 50-200mm zoom lens any good? at 08/07/2009 - 11:32

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo