All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on Dark screen on trying to review image's. What's this please? at 12/08/2016 - 22:46
SMC version is the original, HD version is WR and has updated coatings, the new one is retractable and has an electronic aperture control that is KAF4 mount. This needs the K-70 or a very recent body that has updated firmware. K-1 and K-3 II and I think K-S2 are usable.
Comment by johnriley posted on Confused over lens type at 12/08/2016 - 22:42
Comment by johnriley posted on Dark screen on trying to review image's. What's this please? at 12/08/2016 - 09:52
This will equally apply to all marques.
The advantage is that we have Pentax lenses we can use without limitations on function and many of them will be perfectly up to the job. We can then make corrections in software that were impossible on film, so the prospect seems good enough to me.
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax 20-35mm f/4 on the K-1 at 12/08/2016 - 09:49
The concept of "budget" lenses existed in the 1970s to a limited degree, and usually meant third party lenses. Marque lenses were all of a standard, the only exception being a lower cost 50mm to fit on economy bodies. Even then, for a few years the 50mm f/2 would simply have been a 50mm f/1.8 with a baffle fitted inside to restrict the maximum aperture. It was all about perception.
There did appear some Star lenses, but these were long telephotos at huge, professional, prices. Eventually we also got a range of lower cost K mount lenses, which resurrected the Takumar name to set them apart. They were of simpler construction, but still very good lenses.
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax 20-35mm f/4 on the K-1 at 12/08/2016 - 07:47



I'm very pleased with both the super condition of the lens and also the quality of the results. One day I may be able to afford a 15-30mm and go wider, but for now this lens is very satisfactory and a lot more compact too.
Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax 20-35mm f/4 on the K-1 at 11/08/2016 - 23:21
Comment by johnriley posted on Best Lens for Pentax K-x at 11/08/2016 - 21:36
Apart from a goodwill gesture, it could be difficult to claim a free repair after four years. Manufactured items do fail and it would be up to the buyer to prove there was a fault from the start that has meant an early fail of the item. There's a lot of misleading information on the web and it's often more complex than we think. Is four years a reasonable length of time before experiencing a component failure? How long can we expect to receive an item to receive free repairs?
The two year warranty would have been dealt with via the supplier, SRS in this case, and I wouldn't involve another supplier to complicate the process. The six year life thing is something else. The camera hasn't reached the end of its life, it's had a component fail that can be repaired.
My personal choice would have been to approach SRS first and get the camera assessed. If it's fair wear and tear then maybe we have to bite the bullet and pay, maybe a compromise, maybe a gesture of goodwill, who knows until the process is carried through?
Comment by johnriley posted on Dark screen on trying to review image's. What's this please? at 11/08/2016 - 15:00
Comment by johnriley posted on FS: SMC Pentax-FA 20-35mm F4 AL - Nr Mint at 11/08/2016 - 09:24
I use one myself, but also the Pentax 75-300mm FA J that's available at an incredible £119 from SRS. Not quite as good as the 55-300mm, but not far off and full frame as well.
Comment by johnriley posted on Best Lens for Pentax K-x at 11/08/2016 - 08:48


I think when Louise has actually phoned SRS to voice her concerns we should start to see how this will unfold for her. Hopefully some compromise will be reached with Pentax, depending of course on what the actual fault is.