Is the Da 50-200mm zoom lens any good?
Posted 08/07/2009 - 11:32
Link
The 50-200mm is compact, light and inexpensive. It's also very good.
The 55-300mm is a bigger lens, but is slightly better i think than the 50-200mm.
One advantage of the 50-200mm is that if you are also using the 18-55mm they share the same 52mm filter thread, so the same filters and accessories can be used on both.
The 55-300mm is a bigger lens, but is slightly better i think than the 50-200mm.
One advantage of the 50-200mm is that if you are also using the 18-55mm they share the same 52mm filter thread, so the same filters and accessories can be used on both.
Best regards, John
Posted 08/07/2009 - 12:41
Link
Thanks John. I'll take that into account. I think for a big zoom that i am only going to use on the odd occasion, the 55-300 is a bit out of my price range, after having spent 600 euro on a 16-50. If I can find one a bit cheaper i will definently go for that one.
Cheers mate
Cheers mate
Posted 09/07/2009 - 10:19
Link
Hi Mattox,
I really have warmed to the 50-200, a nice lens.
Does the price of a lens always reflect it's quality? imo not always. I paid £129.99 a couple of months ago, who knows, in a few months time it could be a £300 lens the way price rises are going.
good luck with your decision.
Regards
Chris
K200D
I really have warmed to the 50-200, a nice lens.
Does the price of a lens always reflect it's quality? imo not always. I paid £129.99 a couple of months ago, who knows, in a few months time it could be a £300 lens the way price rises are going.
good luck with your decision.
Regards
Chris
K200D
Posted 09/07/2009 - 19:00
Link
I use the 50-200 on a K10D body and because of the superb imagery from a genuine Pentax lens I bought a DA300. The 50-200 knocks spots off my Tamron 28-300 which, in my opinion having used the Pentax zoom is soft at the extreme zoom and generally a bit naff. I am sure others will disagree but I think the manufacturers products match better than third party ones. Yep the Pentax is a cracking lightweight compact zoom and is well worth having.
Cedric
Cedric
Enjoy life
Posted 09/07/2009 - 19:04
Link
I have one and use it from time to time. It produces quite acceptable results and I'd guess that if you look at my Flickr pictures you might be hard pressed to see the difference in quality. You can when editing but in JPEG?
Really nice light lens.
Mike
Really nice light lens.
Mike
---------------------------------------------------
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
Posted 09/07/2009 - 19:06
Link
Thanks guys. Sounds like i have been convinced. But one thing, what is the focus speed like? One thing that has always knocked me down is the speed. Ofcourse my SDM 16-50mm does well, but the kit lense and my trusty old FA 35mm are a bit on the slow side. Sometimes you really miss that candid moment and it is so so frustrating.
Posted 09/07/2009 - 19:56
Link
I wouldn`t get too hung up about focus speed. There are many variables that will affect it. Keep practicing will help capture that moment. it always amazes me how much we see developing in front of the camera as we are using it. personally I don`t find the DA 300 any different on the focus time. Probably only looking at nano seconds.
Cedric
Cedric
Enjoy life
Posted 09/07/2009 - 20:02
Link
Can't say I have any issues with the focus speed but then I try not to be in a rush. If I think I'm shooting candids I'll pre focus as best I can.
It's a pity you didn't get one when Jessops were doing them at rock bottom prices like £29.
Mike
It's a pity you didn't get one when Jessops were doing them at rock bottom prices like £29.
Mike
---------------------------------------------------
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
Posted 10/07/2009 - 14:26
Link
Very interesting......
I would like a lens to complement my kit 18-55 for the K200. Also seems to be good on price and is not too large.
So, this would be a good buy for a second lens? Size and weight is a big consideration for me as it will get carried about! It does seem inexpensive in comparison to many of the others though......?
I would like a lens to complement my kit 18-55 for the K200. Also seems to be good on price and is not too large.
So, this would be a good buy for a second lens? Size and weight is a big consideration for me as it will get carried about! It does seem inexpensive in comparison to many of the others though......?
K5, K200 and several film Pentax cameras!
Posted 10/07/2009 - 15:41
Link
Sounds like it'd be good enough for me!!
Give me something different. Rather than messing about too much with trying to find good second hand lenses........
Being a poor postgrad too.......
Give me something different. Rather than messing about too much with trying to find good second hand lenses........
Being a poor postgrad too.......
K5, K200 and several film Pentax cameras!
Posted 12/07/2009 - 11:21
Link
Posted 13/07/2009 - 15:34
Link
great shot mate. beaut exposure and sharpness. looks like the lense is a goah for the price judging from the quality of this photo
Posted 13/07/2009 - 15:57
Link
Looking for something cheap but good quality in this focal range myself so this thread has been most useful.
SimplyElectronics have this at £120 which looks like a good deal.
http://www.simplyelectronics.net/mainproduct.php?pid=1738
Regards,
George.
SimplyElectronics have this at £120 which looks like a good deal.
http://www.simplyelectronics.net/mainproduct.php?pid=1738
Regards,
George.
K-5, Sigma 17-70 DC, FA 50 1.7, DA 50-200 & Metz 58AF-1.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



424 posts
17 years
Having said that I was interested to know what people out there thought of the 50-200mm DA. Ideally i'd love to get a 50-135 but don't have the money to put forward.
Any help would be greatly appreciated