All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on 100mm Lenses at 10/09/2009 - 16:03
Comment by johnriley posted on Which Film camera at 10/09/2009 - 16:00
When I look at the coatings side by side they reflect the same to my eyes, so maybe they are the same.
I'd be happy with either, but because of resale values later on the Samsung one would have to cost significantly less IMHO.
Comment by johnriley posted on 100mm Macro - Pentax v Samsung. at 10/09/2009 - 13:39
My MZ5 and MZ3 cameras are both still going strong. Sometimes faults may occur, but not to all of them and if the OP buys from SRS there's that useful guarantee period.
For £25.00 how wrong can it be?
Comment by johnriley posted on Which Film camera at 10/09/2009 - 13:37
Comment by johnriley posted on Which Film camera at 10/09/2009 - 12:26
Decentering figures - Lens name - MTF 10 lpm - MTF 40 lpm
5% Canon f2 92% 53%
6% Canon f2.8 92% 51%
7% Konica Hexanon 91% 51%
6% Minolta MD 93% 59%
2% Nikkor 91% 51%
15% Nikon Series E 92% 47%
23% Olympus Zuiko 92% 46%
6% Pentax-M 93% 60%
2% Zeiss Planar 92% 58%
As we can see, the Pentax lens in this group is a star, even without a *, and we know that this lens has always been highly regarded. I've owned several, and all have been sparkling performers.
Comment by johnriley posted on 100mm Lenses at 10/09/2009 - 12:22
Party pictures and things like that I leave to others, or, if pressed, I use a compact digital camera.
Comment by johnriley posted on differentiating between holiday snaps and photos at 10/09/2009 - 11:48


Would some 255 pixels be acceptable? I'm coming round to the view that they might be if the context is appropriate. Nothing is set in stone and all rules are up to be broken....
Having said that, I'm not suggesting that blown out areas would be OK, just that out of 14.6 million pixels I could overlook a handful here and there!