PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
We use Billingham Hadley Pro bags - very accessible, waterproof and compact. We find them big enough in the field and they hold quite a bit of kit.

Comment by johnriley posted on Bag recommendations/comments? at 23/03/2010 - 23:47

johnriley
The SMC Pentax-DA 55-300mm zoom is the best I've used for digital. The L version is relatively cheap, but nowhere near your £40 requirement.

Comment by johnriley posted on Sharpest, cheapest and fastest long zoom? at 23/03/2010 - 23:35

johnriley
It's probably a question of how worthwhile it is to delete people who aren't active anyway. Is it a problem?

Comment by johnriley posted on New members at 23/03/2010 - 20:38

johnriley
I would think one of the biggest dangers would be to reach into a bag and put a nice greasy fingerprint right in the centre of a lens.

If you have a routine that never alters, putting a lenscap on is not exactly time consuming.

Comment by johnriley posted on How do handle your lenses when shooting? at 22/03/2010 - 23:02

johnriley
Yes, Pearl White was the choice, it just looked too good to resist!

Comment by johnriley posted on Opinions on I-10? at 22/03/2010 - 22:49

johnriley
Yes indeed I do and I've been using it for a few days now.

Suffice it to say that the design is gorgeous, the quality is so far very encouraging and it seems a little more reliable in terms of those results that a lot of small cameras.

I've decided to order a vintage look leather and canvas Pentax case for it as well. Might as well do the job properly!

I you want to see some results have a look at today's set of 6 images of gavestones on EPZ. My username there is johnriley1uk

Comment by johnriley posted on Opinions on I-10? at 22/03/2010 - 17:33

johnriley
So far my one and only problem has been a minor software fault on a new I-10, exchanged instantly by SRS.

And this is covering a lot of time and a lot of cameras.

Comment by johnriley posted on Repairs Grief at 22/03/2010 - 14:53

johnriley
What you are doing in the analogy is cutting out the bright sky so you can see the view more clearly. This is what the lens hood does. I know it's not exactly the same, but it does illustrate the advantage of shielding.

In a similar way we might use the visor in our cars.

It would be interesting to make an eye hood that did not encroach on our field of view to see if it had any effect, but we have such wide angle eyes it probably wouldn't help much!

Comment by johnriley posted on UV filters. at 22/03/2010 - 10:22

johnriley
Actually, for a long time I have used the Pentax dedicated hoods even in the days we had to buy then separately. This was mainly because they clipped on instead of having to mess about screwing and unscrewing them.

Using a hood is far more important than using a filter. If we use a filter that's a reflective glass surface too far forwards to be effectively shielded by the hood.

Comment by johnriley posted on UV filters. at 22/03/2010 - 10:11

johnriley
Quote:
I probably don't use the hood enough - something else to look into in terms of IQ.
I use a lens hood all the time.

On a very bright day, just look at a bright distant scene, then see how much easier it is to see if you shield your eyes with your hand or step into the shadow of a tree or building.

Your lenses feel the same way.

Comment by johnriley posted on UV filters. at 22/03/2010 - 09:50

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo