All Forum Comments
Comment by johnriley posted on Official K-5 specs !!! at 21/09/2010 - 08:51
I'd be interested to see examples of what sort of images are found to be a problem.
Comment by johnriley posted on Official K-5 specs !!! at 21/09/2010 - 08:32
£600 would be way over the top for what is essentially a kit lens
A little early IMHO to be dismissing this. I expect it to be as good as all the other Pentax lenses - and that's a pretty high standard.
Comment by johnriley posted on 18-135mm WR at 21/09/2010 - 08:29
Comment by johnriley posted on AF- K7 compared against K5 at 21/09/2010 - 07:34
If you would care to check your Profile, please let me know if you find any spam that still needs deleting.
Comment by johnriley posted on The Demise of Miss Julian at 20/09/2010 - 22:44
Comment by johnriley posted on Weekly Comp #167 Comments - Adults at work or play at 20/09/2010 - 22:42
The focusing speed I've never had a problem with, but the range of this lens and the WR look very interesting.
Comment by johnriley posted on 18-135mm WR at 20/09/2010 - 22:40
Comment by johnriley posted on My first images from the i-10 at 20/09/2010 - 22:37
Comment by johnriley posted on Shutter Blur on K7 at 20/09/2010 - 18:43
Comment by johnriley posted on K200D and Powerzoom lens at 20/09/2010 - 18:36


What you have done is correctly apply a technique to a situation. You have condensed the dynamic range so that it can be reproduced on a monitor or print. This image does not represent the original dynamic range, which probably we couldn't even see on our screens.
To be honest, no matter how much dynamic range a camera had there would need to be a corresponding range in whatever the viewing medium was. This doesn't really exist at this time, so HDR applied moderately is the perfect answer. You've done a good job.