PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
If I approached this one, my first feeling would be that I'd return at a better time of day when the building was lit. Then there would be no problem, and arguably the image would be more dramatic. A matter of taste and also of logisticsa - is it possible to be there at a better time? Is the building ever out of the shadows?

What you have done is correctly apply a technique to a situation. You have condensed the dynamic range so that it can be reproduced on a monitor or print. This image does not represent the original dynamic range, which probably we couldn't even see on our screens.

To be honest, no matter how much dynamic range a camera had there would need to be a corresponding range in whatever the viewing medium was. This doesn't really exist at this time, so HDR applied moderately is the perfect answer. You've done a good job.

Comment by johnriley posted on Official K-5 specs !!! at 21/09/2010 - 08:51

johnriley
The dynamic range of digital sensors already exceeds anything that transparency film ever offered or that photographic paper could ever reproduce.

I'd be interested to see examples of what sort of images are found to be a problem.

Comment by johnriley posted on Official K-5 specs !!! at 21/09/2010 - 08:32

johnriley
Quote:
£600 would be way over the top for what is essentially a kit lens
To be fair, this assumes that a "kit lens" is by defintion a cheap, poor lens. Don't forget that the 43mm f1.9 Limited is also a kit lens - it was originally only sold as a kit with the then new MZ-3.

A little early IMHO to be dismissing this. I expect it to be as good as all the other Pentax lenses - and that's a pretty high standard.

Comment by johnriley posted on 18-135mm WR at 21/09/2010 - 08:29

johnriley
It's already been posted, so I'll lock this one to avoid confusion.

Comment by johnriley posted on AF- K7 compared against K5 at 21/09/2010 - 07:34

johnriley
I've been steadily working through the profile pages to remove the spam from "Miss Julian" and others and we're now at the point where I'm not finding many, if any.

If you would care to check your Profile, please let me know if you find any spam that still needs deleting.

Comment by johnriley posted on The Demise of Miss Julian at 20/09/2010 - 22:44

johnriley
Thread now open for discussion.

Comment by johnriley posted on Weekly Comp #167 Comments - Adults at work or play at 20/09/2010 - 22:42

johnriley
I'm pretty much sold on the concept of the WR lenses - very liberating to be able to carry on shooting in the rain.

The focusing speed I've never had a problem with, but the range of this lens and the WR look very interesting.

Comment by johnriley posted on 18-135mm WR at 20/09/2010 - 22:40

johnriley
It's an absolute bargain at the current price.

Comment by johnriley posted on My first images from the i-10 at 20/09/2010 - 22:37

johnriley
Not quite a focal plane shutter, but thanks for the link - it's ages since I saw that bit of film.

Comment by johnriley posted on Shutter Blur on K7 at 20/09/2010 - 18:43

johnriley
The instruction book will tell us as it still lists whether or not PZ is supported.

Comment by johnriley posted on K200D and Powerzoom lens at 20/09/2010 - 18:36

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo