You'll find various threads here on the subject.

In summary, the I-10 is a high quality compact that delivers nice sharp images with realistic colour. The SR is sensor-shift and works very well, much better than the software based solutions of some compacts.

I carry one everywhere and with care can produce excellent images. The biggest enemy of quality for small cameras is probably camera shake, so the SR is a real advantage.

I'm sure you'll enjoy using one and the nostalgia is an added bonus.

Pentax have always made super lenses and I'd be especially confident in buying any of their macro lenses.

Yes indeed, an interesting lesson in assumptions!

That's pretty good, Father Ted. I would also say art is about expression. If you have expression of an emotion, idea, etc., then you have art.

It can be good art whether or not it satisfies the creator only or also others who view it.

Bad art is perhaps where the creator aspires to create something but there is actually no real idea behind that creation.

The lens in question was clearly defined by the first three posts. Ken even mentions quite clearly f2.4

Would you care to elucidate?

It was down to the canal at Worsley at dawn today and the X90 worked very well in the low dawn light.

Sue was using her K20D with the 18-250mm Pentax lens and she found that the DSLR metered totally differently to the bridge camera.

There is a 4 second limitation with the X90, but I get the feeling that this example does extend the shutter speed range a bit further than that. This is quite usual in that there's a minimum spec that is often exceeded.

I'll post something from the shoot a little later on - no time to sort it out just now.

Paul, this is a Classified Ad and all that banter was a bit much for someone new. I've just read it again and I think it was right to remove it.

Moved to Classified Ads.

Moved to Classified Ads.