All Forum Comments
Same fitting.
Comment by johnriley posted on Will this fit k5 at 28/02/2011 - 17:04
Yes it will.
Comment by johnriley posted on Will this fit k5 at 28/02/2011 - 16:47
Sue and I explored an abandoned house in one of Manchester's parks - it was especially poignant for her as we knew the last park keeper who lived there and she could look at the wreck of the rooms she'd visited and even slept in as a child.
Deserted and mouldering buildings hold so many memories of so many people. It's an environment to be respected, but sadly many would rather trash them.
Just look at what happened to Gwyrch Castle in North Wales. I've been in that building when it was in use and jousting was held in the grounds. Now it's a sad shell and the loacal police and council sat back and watched it happening.
Deserted and mouldering buildings hold so many memories of so many people. It's an environment to be respected, but sadly many would rather trash them.
Just look at what happened to Gwyrch Castle in North Wales. I've been in that building when it was in use and jousting was held in the grounds. Now it's a sad shell and the loacal police and council sat back and watched it happening.
acmdccxlvi wrote:
First - the reason I posted twice was I didn't know where the most appropriate place to post was - so I tried two. Second, I'm not advocating vandalism - I'm merely re-stating a difference of two opinions I've come across. Third, the reason I haven't responded before is that I don't have 'net facilities at home, so I have to use public facilities when I can.
On the other hand, it could be argued that even passive urbexing is illegal trespass and doing "light, unstructural" damage (smashing windows, etc.) is not hurting anyone and is actually part of the natural decay of a building, as it tends, almost inevitably, to occur in places which are left unguarded.
Are you really suggesting that it's OK to go around breaking windows? For what reason could any responsible person want to do this?First - the reason I posted twice was I didn't know where the most appropriate place to post was - so I tried two. Second, I'm not advocating vandalism - I'm merely re-stating a difference of two opinions I've come across. Third, the reason I haven't responded before is that I don't have 'net facilities at home, so I have to use public facilities when I can.
On the other hand, it could be argued that even passive urbexing is illegal trespass and doing "light, unstructural" damage (smashing windows, etc.) is not hurting anyone and is actually part of the natural decay of a building, as it tends, almost inevitably, to occur in places which are left unguarded.
darkskies wrote:
John,
Is your picture taken at Worsley?
Cheers,
ds
Yes, very early one winter morning.John,
Is your picture taken at Worsley?
Cheers,
ds
Comment by johnriley posted on Weekly competition #189 Bridges. at 28/02/2011 - 13:27
Did the camera have a problem locking focus with the fast moving subjects? The camera won't fire unless in focus.
Comment by johnriley posted on Strange K5 Fault at 28/02/2011 - 12:14
The video seems fine, certainly at the size shown on the web. Not so sure about the music though - it doesn't follow the action and seems disconnected from it. I also found the stop-start nature of the music track a bit irritating.
Comment by johnriley posted on K-5 Video mode at 28/02/2011 - 12:01
IIRC the instruction books say that if the camera locks up, remove the battery for a while then reinsert and if all is OK a repair is not necessary. Equivalent of rebooting a computer I guess.
I'm assuming the battery was OK? And that the lens contacts were clean and the lens mounted firmly in position?
If the fault repeats and/or persists then it looks as though a repair may be necessary.
I'm assuming the battery was OK? And that the lens contacts were clean and the lens mounted firmly in position?
If the fault repeats and/or persists then it looks as though a repair may be necessary.
Comment by johnriley posted on Strange K5 Fault at 28/02/2011 - 11:56
Nice subject, I'll particularly enjoy this one.
Comment by johnriley posted on Weekly competition #190 Surreal at 28/02/2011 - 10:21
