JAK

Joined: 29th January 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

JAK
johnriley wrote:
As it turns out, the camera is more resilient than I expected, so this is now a very long term project.

Perhaps in a few decades from now this little MG might have gained some notoriety...
Well it's a Pentax - prototype WR!

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Project Decay #23 at 22/02/2013 - 11:09

JAK
No doubt would be described as in excellent condition by some on that well known internet auction site!

Wasn't the camera worth anything? Surely the body shell might be welcomed by someone should theirs have become dented.
I had an ME with a dented prism cover and was about to get it repaired only it got stolen in the meantime. Oh well, saved the cost of its repair.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Project Decay #23 at 22/02/2013 - 10:55

JAK
walkeja wrote:
Got fed-up with it, was saying to myself, "Get on with it!" and turned it off!
Me too.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on best canon fail lol at 22/02/2013 - 10:41

JAK
It is alleged that they sell the cameras used in their videos on as new. See:
http://fstoppers.com/digitalrev-allegedly-selling-used-cameras-as-new-and-are-ye...
This includes links to the original allegations.
It is suggested that they don't use the straps as that would make it obvious the camera has been used.

Quote:
A bit of glue and polish and they'll sell it on as ex-demo
So apparently no - not ex-demo but brand new!

I think Kai's videos are wearing a bit thin now - he didn't seem at ease in this one - I wonder if the allegations are affecting him.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on best canon fail lol at 22/02/2013 - 10:38

JAK
Anyone spot that the DA*300mm has a field of view of 90 degrees. It's at 4m 37secs. A good idea to do the video but surely someone should have spotted that.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Chosing a Lens at 19/02/2013 - 17:43

JAK
The D600 isn't that different in price to the K-5 when it first appeared.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Full Frame. at 19/02/2013 - 14:31

JAK
JohnMcD wrote:
One of the rarer and faster Pentax M series primes starting at F2.8.
Is the zoom mechanism stuck thus converting it into a prime?

John K

Comment by JAK posted on FS Pentax M series 35-70 F2.8-4 at 19/02/2013 - 00:06

JAK
Agreed with that, unless a new camera is involved that isn't supported in the old version such as a K-30.
If still using the same camera then it must be a software issue if it worked before. Reinstalling PE9 might solve it.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on 'Elp Please! at 16/02/2013 - 23:54

JAK
You may need to update Camera Raw. I think version 6.5 is the latest update for Elements 9. Here's a link for it:

http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5271

Of course, if you already have that version it might not be that!

As a general rule, using DNG's keeps things more compatible and future proof. We're lucky Pentax support that in-camera; with some other makes the files need converting to that.

If you have a camera that is no longer supported in Elements 9, you should be able to convert the PEF's you have from it to DNG with Adobe DNG converter.

The latest version supports the K-30:

http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5486

John K

Comment by JAK posted on 'Elp Please! at 16/02/2013 - 21:37

JAK
Are these PEF's or DNG's ?

John K

Comment by JAK posted on 'Elp Please! at 16/02/2013 - 21:23

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo