JAK

Joined: 29th January 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

JAK
LittleSkink wrote:

be good to know the Aperture, Shutter, ISO but I think the camera is running out of adjustments
The exif data on these images is intact. Install fxif or similar which gives you:

Camera Maker: PENTAX
Camera Model: PENTAX K-5
Lens: smc PENTAX-DA* 50-135mm F2.8 ED [IF] SDM
Image Date: 2013-08-25 13:19:32 +0100
Focal Length: 80.0mm (35mm equivalent: 120mm)
Aperture: f/6.3
Exposure Time: 0.0056 s (1/180)
ISO equiv: 200
Exposure Bias: none
Metering Mode: Center Weight
Exposure: aperture priority (semi-auto)
White Balance: Auto
Flash Fired: Yes (enforced)
Orientation: Normal
Color Space: sRGB
GPS Coordinate: undefined, undefined
Creator: PETER ELTON
Copyright: PETER ELTON
Software: Adobe Photoshop CS4 Windows


JohnK

Comment by JAK posted on over exposure using fill in flash at 27/08/2013 - 10:42

JAK
Mike-P wrote:
To get the equivalent APSC file size of 16mp you need a FF sensor capable of 36mp (D800). Owch.
It's quite likely that the lower resolution image will have less noise and might actually produce a preferable result. Images from a K100D don't always look worse than those from a K-5 despite the lesser resolution.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Pentax FF Dead, Maybe at 24/08/2013 - 15:20

JAK
michaelblue wrote:
....and will wildlife photographers want full frame....reducing the focal length of their long lenses? .....just a thought
How's using a different sensor going to change the focal length of a lens? That's nonsense.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Pentax FF Dead, Maybe at 24/08/2013 - 14:32

JAK
JonSchick wrote:
I'm arguing for a mirrorless FF camera with a new mount (and adapter for K lenses) but there is no sense in changing the mount for dSLR bodies, APSC or FF.
What would you like this new mount to offer that the K mount doesn't have? Should they force the angle of light to be too close to the sensor and I could foresee all sorts of aberrations being introduced.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Pentax FF Dead, Maybe at 21/08/2013 - 19:18

JAK
If you sell them you won't need to bother insuring them! What you can get selling them and insuring them at replacement value might be quite different. Insurance value might be cost new - check SRS prices or have your purchase receipts to hand, second hand prices would be what you can get which depends on all manner of factors, mainly what someone is willing to pay. A trawl of eBay (check sold prices: not what some are hoping for!) and the site here should give some idea of current going rates but even then it depends on condition and to some extent location. (Sending a bulky package half way round the world can be expensive and off-putting.)

John K

Comment by JAK posted on How much is my Gear worth now ? at 19/08/2013 - 17:40

JAK
There are compatible wireless remote controls available that cover that range, eg: http://www.firstcall-photographic.co.uk/products/3503/hahnel-giga-t-pro-wireless...

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Remote control of newer Pentax DSLRs? at 18/08/2013 - 20:09

JAK
Colour balance looks OK to me. My thought is perhaps a little over-sharpened but otherwise fine.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Coombe Wood & Garden, Croydon at 18/08/2013 - 14:26

JAK
I see. I've had lots like that too! As you say, someone might like to try and fix it for the cost of a stamp.

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Faulty Tokina 28mm 2.8 Free to Good Home at 14/08/2013 - 14:44

JAK
If you've only just got it, why not send it back to the seller for a refund?

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Faulty Tokina 28mm 2.8 Free to Good Home at 14/08/2013 - 14:14

JAK
A quick reminder that this competition ends at midnight tonight (UK time.)

John K

Comment by JAK posted on Monthly Competition #13 - "Wish You Were Here" Competition at 31/07/2013 - 13:57

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo