Bad link, try this:
http://www.pocket-lint.com/review/126781-pentax-k-3-review
(Doesn't need the full stop!)

Grain at middling sensitivities:
Really an 'against'?

Noise on video soundtrack caused by lens mechanics:
So how do you get the K-3 to autofocus while videoing. I've not managed to do that or have I missed a hidden menu option?

Smaller lens arsenal than competition.
Given Pentax's legacy glass the reverse is surely true. Who else has the Limited equivalents?

Mind 4.5 stars out of 5 is more than respectable, but was the camera fully tested? I suspect not.

What about a K-30 or k-50 ?

Why should BT subscribers who do not use flickr be expected to subsidise it (and yes BT Sport too?)

Wow, that is heavy going!

Rice High made mention several years ago: http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2011/04/should-you-use-intermediate-iso-speeds.html

It seems it all depends how the firmware is programmed.

Yes. I seem to remember that photography was once described as painting with light but I cannot recall the source for that.
They're not that dissimilar from the pieces of art David Hockney conjures up on his ipad.

By being beefed up with extreme PP it makes the images noticed, hence why we're discussing them here. Had they been more normal we'd have nothing to say. What HDR tries to achieve is to convert a photograph into a piece of art work, a sort of convergance of art with photography. I cannot say I dislike them as art pieces, but certainly not as realistic representations. It depends if you want a striking image for the wall or a something realistic. Both have their places.

:

So where would the camera be shipped from if purchased at that price?

Eneloops can be reasonably fast charged: link and link
Plus a bit more here: http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?190625-Eneloop-Charging-Rate

So my question is, are these images something to aspire to, or shy away from?