JAK

Joined: 29th January 2010

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

JAK
Phew! Bad enough but could have been worse. Wonder why you can't talk to them??

Comment by JAK posted on Foot for a HD Pentax DAF 150-450 lens at 25/05/2017 - 23:39

JAK
That Pentax 18-35 would still be your best buy for now. Not perfect but it is a Pentax and cost is peanuts. You could use it on a KP too!
https://www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/SMC-Pentax-FAJ-18-35mm-F4-5.6-Zoom-Lens...

Comment by JAK posted on Help with a wide angled lens for my K1 at 25/05/2017 - 18:36

JAK
bforbes wrote:
I've just broken mine courtesy of a tipping tripod.

For future reference:-

DFA 150-450 Tripod seat assy 41610 0-D401 £104.42 Plus post & packing (£5) plus VAT. From Johnsons Photopia
Oh dear. Hope there wasn't any damage to the lens itself or the camera.
Your experience makes a nonsense of the comment earlier in the thread that Johnsons couldn't help.

Comment by JAK posted on Foot for a HD Pentax DAF 150-450 lens at 25/05/2017 - 18:32

JAK
stub wrote:
I was considering the Tamron 17-50
Isn't that just an APS-C lens? If you're buying new for full frame why would you get that? The 15-30 is Tamron's offering, albeit modified by Pentax. You could consider the Sigma 12-24 but resolution isn't as good as the prime Samyang or Irix, particularly at the edges. Samyang also do a 12mm although its a fish-eye. That can however be de-fished using Fisheye Hemi, a Photoshop plug-in (works well and with Elements too.)
As to using filters, not going too wide makes things simpler, and a polarizer doesn't always give the right effect with very wide lenses as they darken skies mostly at 90 deg to the sun so can lead to an uneven darkening. (ND grads not affected by that.)
Re Scout estimation. one had to estimate three heights and three widths and be within 10%.

Comment by JAK posted on Help with a wide angled lens for my K1 at 25/05/2017 - 12:51

JAK
stub wrote:
Though non auto focus lenses arnt much use as you regularly dont get to raise the veiwfinder to the eye and have to use a lot of guesswork...
Not really an issue with a super wide. If you want to be inconspicuous the 15-30 isn't the lens to go for as it's quite large. Something like a 20 or 24mm might be worth considering and set it to its hyperfocal distance to get a wide depth of field. With the 14 / 15's you'd have to poke the camera up really close or your subject will be a speck in the distance though DOF is even greater. Many compact cameras of the past didn't have focussing and relied on a default hyperfocal setting, allowing around anything from 5 feet to infinity to be in focus (albeit there really can only be one point of true focus.)
With the 15-30 you'd need to put the camera to the eye to see the field of view, so why not use that approach to focussing a manual wide lens? Have it pre-focussed, or guess the distance and set it directly the old fashioned way. Its not hard to guess 5, 10, 20, 40 metres or whatever but if that doesn't come naturally because you weren't a boy scout it only takes a bit of practice!

Comment by JAK posted on Help with a wide angled lens for my K1 at 25/05/2017 - 10:31

JAK
One a bit cheaper here:
https://www.lcegroup.co.uk/Used/Pentax-15-30mm-F2.8-ED-SDM-WR-***MINT&BOXED***_165205.html
Warning - it is heavy, not only in price!

If you want a real bargain, seek out a Pentax 18-35 which used to be the kit lens with the initial DSLRs. It is full frame though and perfectly usable while you're saving up. Well under £100.
https://www.harrisoncameras.co.uk/pd/Used-Pentax-AF-18-35mm-F4-56-Lens-AL_USED-1...
Otherwise seek out a prime of your preferred focal length. Neither the Samyang 14mm or the Irix 15mm will completely break the bank, nor will they break your back carrying them! But they're not zooms of course.
You might even get by with your 10-20 by restricting it to around 17-20mm, room to experiment with that.

Comment by JAK posted on Help with a wide angled lens for my K1 at 24/05/2017 - 23:57

JAK
Oh well, sorry to hear that. I wonder why it isn't coupling correctly.

Comment by JAK posted on Panagor automatic extension tube set at 24/05/2017 - 19:30

JAK
The Pentax K-3ii replacement was originally rumoured to come out within six months of the KP's release, that would have been by the end of June. I've not seen anything to confirm or deny whether that will happen.

Comment by JAK posted on Latest Pentax rumours at 24/05/2017 - 17:32

JAK
Yes, it should work like an M lens then. M mode and green button metering. Check that the aperture lever is working the aperture mechanism; it should do.

Comment by JAK posted on Panagor automatic extension tube set at 24/05/2017 - 14:29

JAK
Could it be the same issue as this? :

Comment Image


The scraped away area was required to get an earth return.

Do your tubes have electrical contacts? As I said, its hard to diagnose the problem without seeing it!

I have a set of Jessops auto extension tubes and everything works fine.

Comment by JAK posted on Panagor automatic extension tube set at 24/05/2017 - 11:03

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo